A New Memory Perspective on the Sentence Comprehension Deficits of School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Implications for Theory, Assessment, and Intervention

References

• Abbot-Smith, K., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition.The Linguistic Review, 23(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.011
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Adams, E., Nguyen, A., & Cowan, N. (2018). Theories of working memory: Differences in definition, degree of modularity, role of attention and purpose.Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0114
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Alt, M., & Plante, E. (2006). Factors that influence lexical and semantic fast-mapping of young children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(5), 941–954. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/068)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference.Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Andrews, G., Ogden, J., & Halford, G. (2017). Resolving conflicts between syntax and plausibility in sentence comprehension.Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 13(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0203-8
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Archibald, L., & Gathercole, S. (2007). The complexities of complex memory span: Storage and processing deficits in specific language impairment.Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.004
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Archibald, L., & Joanisse, M. (2009). On the sensitivity and specificity of nonword repetition and sentence recall to language and memory impairments in children.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(4), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0099)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Clark, E. (2011). Why brush your teeth is better than teeth—Children's word production is facilitated in familiar sentence-frames. Language Learning and.Development, 7(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2010.505489
  Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes.In K. Spence & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3
  Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies.Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Balthazar, C., Ebbels, S., & Zwitserlood, R. (2020). Explicit grammatical intervention for developmental language disorder: Three approaches.Language, Speech, Hearings Services in Schools, 51(2), 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00046
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Bannard, C., & Lieven, E. (2012). Formulaic language in L1 acquisition.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000062
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model.In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A crosslinguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies.Child Development, 55(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129947
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). Test for Reception of Grammar Version 2. Pearson.
  Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2006). What causes specific language impairment in children?.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00439.x
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Bock, K., Dell, G., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production.Cognition, 104(3), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.003
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Bock, K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences.Cognition, 35(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-I
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Bolderson, S., Dosanjh, C., Milligan, C., Pring, T., & Chiat, S. (2011). Colourful semantics: A clinical investigation.Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 27(3), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659011412248
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Elman, J., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Botting, N. (2020). Language, literacy and cognitive skills of young adults with developmental language disorder (DLD).International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 55(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12518
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Botting, N., Simkin, Z., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2006). Associated reading skills in children with a history of specific language impairment.Reading and Writing, 19, 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4322-4
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Bower, G. (2008). The evolution of a cognitive psychologist: A journey from simple behaviors to complex mental acts.Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093722
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Burgess, G., Gray, J., Conway, A., & Braver, T. (2011). Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024695
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Capone, N., & McGregor, K. (2005). The effect of semantic representation on toddlers' word retrieval.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1468–1480. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/102)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (2014). Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language–Fourth Edition. Pro-Ed.
  Google Scholar
• Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (2017). Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language–Second Edition. Pro-Ed.
  Google Scholar
• R. Cattell (Ed.). (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046743
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Catts, H., Bridges, M., Little, T., & Tomblin, J. (2008). Reading achievement growth in children with language impairments.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(6), 1569–1579. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0259
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Catts, H., & Kamhi, A. (2012). Language and reading disabilities (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  Google Scholar
• Chater, N., McCauley, S., & Christiansen, M. (2016). Language as skill: Intertwining comprehension and production.Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.004
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Christiansen, M., & MacDonald, M. (1999). Fractionated working memory: Even in pebbles, it's still a soup stone.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99251783
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Coco, M., Garraffa, M., Branigan, H., Miyake, N., Peebles, D., & Cooper, R. P. (2012). Subject relative production in SLI children during syntactic priming and sentence repetition.Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 228–233). Cognitive Science Society. https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2012/papers/0052/paper0052.pdf
  Google Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G. (2003). Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment (SLI).Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 46(5), 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/082)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N., & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment.The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(6), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00770
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G., Durkin, K., Simkin, Z., & Knox, E. (2009). Specific language impairment and school outcomes. I: Identifying and explaining variability at the end of compulsory education.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820801921601
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G., Durkin, K., Toseeb, U., Botting, N., & Pickles, A. (2018). Education and employment outcomes of young adults with a history of developmental language disorder.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12338
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G., Ullman, M., & Lum, J. (2015). The relation between receptive grammar and procedural, declarative, and working memory in specific language impairment.Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01090
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Cornish, H., Dale, R., Kirby, S., & Christiansen, M. (2017). Sequence memory constraints give rise to language-like structure through iterated learning.PLOS ONE, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168532
  Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?.Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage.Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 24, 1158–1170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1191-6
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Cowan, N., Rouder, J., Blume, C., & Saults, J. (2012). Models of verbal working memory capacity: What does it take to make them work?.Psychological Review, 119(3), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027791
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Cowan, N., Saults, J., & Blume, C. (2014). Central and peripheral components of working memory storage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 1806–1836. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036814
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Curran, M. (2020). Complex sentences in an elementary science curriculum: A research note.Language, Speech, Hearings Services in Schools, 51(2), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00064
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Dick, F., Wulfeck, B., Krupa-Kwiatkowski, M., & Bates, L. (2004). The development of complex sentence interpretation in typically developing children compared with children with specific language impairment or early unilateral focal lesions.Developmental Science, 7(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00353.x
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Ebbels, S., Maric, N., Murphy, A., & Turner, G. (2014). Improving comprehension in adolescents with severe receptive language impairments: A randomized control trial of intervention for coordinating conjunctions.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12047
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Ellis Weismer, S., Evans, J., & Hesketh, L. (1999). An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(5), 1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4205.1249
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Engel de Abreu, P., Conway, A., & Gathercole, S. (2010). Working memory and fluid intelligence in young children.Intelligence, 38(6), 552–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.07.003
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Engle, R., Tuholski, S., Laughlin, J., & Conway, A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Evans, J., Saffran, J., & Robe-Torres, K. (2009). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0189)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Ferreira, V., & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming.Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7–8), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600824609
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Ferretti, R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts.Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 516–547. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2728
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Finestack, L. (2014). Language learning of children with typical development using a deductive metalinguistic procedure.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(2), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-12-0408
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Finestack, L. (2018). Evaluation of an explicit intervention to teach novel grammatical forms to children with developmental language disorder.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(8), 2062–2075. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0339
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Finestack, L., & Fey, M. (2009). Evaluation of a deductive procedure to teach grammatical inflections to children with language impairment.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0041
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Finney, M., Montgomery, J., Gillam, R., & Evans, J. (2014). Role of working memory storage and attention focus switching in children's comprehension of spoken object relative sentences.Child Development Research, 54, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/450734
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Foltz, A., Thiele, K., Kahsnitz, D., & Stenneken, P. (2015). Children's syntactic-priming magnitude: Lexical factors and participant characteristics.Journal of Child Language, 42(4), 932–945. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000488
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2007). Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer?.Brain and Language, 101(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.006
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Fukuda, K., Vogel, E., Mayr, U., & Awh, E. (2010). Quantity, not quality: The relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 673–679. https://doi.org/10.3758/17.5.673
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Garraffa, M., Coco, M., & Branigan, H. (2018). Impaired implicit learning of syntactic structure in children with developmental language disorder: Evidence from syntactic priming.Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 3, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941518779939
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Gilchrist, A., Cowan, N., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2009). Investigating the childhood development of working memory using sentences: New evidence for the growth of chunk capacity.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.05.006
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Gillam, R., Cowan, N., & Day, L. (1995). Sequential memory in children with and without language impairment.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(2), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3802.393
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Gillam, R., Cowan, N., & Marler, J. (1998). Information processing by school-age children with specific language impairment: Evidence from a modality effect paradigm.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(4), 913–926. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4104.913
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(6), 1303–1315. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3506.1303
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Gillam, R., Montgomery, J., Evans, J., & Gillam, S. (2019). Cognitive predictors of sentence comprehension in children with and without developmental language disorder: Implications for assessment and treatment.International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2018.1559883
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Gillam, R., Montgomery, J., Gillam, S., & Evans, J. (2017). Working memory in child language disorders.In R. G. Schwartz (Ed.), Handbook of child language disorders (2nd ed., pp. 213–237). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315283531-8
  Google Scholar
• Gillam, R., & Pearson, N. (2004). Test of Narrative Language. Pro-Ed.
  Google Scholar
• S. Gillam, S. Holbrook, J. Mecham, & D. Weller (Eds.). (2018). Pull the Andon rope on working memory capacity interventions until we know more.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0121
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Gómez, R., & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge.Cognition, 70(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00003-7
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Gómez, R., & Lakusta, L. (2004). A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants.Developmental Science, 7(5), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00381.x
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Gómez, R., & Maye, J. (2005). The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning.Infancy, 7(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in0702_4
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Gray, S. (2003). Word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: What predicts success?.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/005)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Grunow, H., Spaulding, T., Gómez, R., & Plante, E. (2006). The effects of variation on learning word order rules by adults with and without language-based learning disabilities.Journal of Communication Disorders, 39(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.11.004
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Hammill, D., McGhee, R., & Ehrler, D. (2018). Detroit Tests of Learning Ability–Fifth Edition. Pro-Ed.
  Google Scholar
• Hamrick, P., Lum, J., & Ullman, M. (2018). Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(7), 1487–1492. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713975115
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Hedenius, M., Persson, J., Tremblay, A., Adi-Japha, E., Veríssimo, J., Dye, C., Alm, P., Jennische, M., Tomblin, J. B., & Ullman, M. T. (2011). Grammar predicts procedural learning and consolidation deficits in children with specific language impairment.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2362–2375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.026
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, C., Beitchman, J., & Brownlie, E. (2010). Twenty-year follow-up of children with and without speech-language impairments: Family, educational, occupational and quality of life outcomes.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0083
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. (2002). The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(8), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01947-2
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Kane, M., Hambrick, D., Tuholski, S., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T., & Engle, R. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Karuza, E., Newport, E., Aslin, R., Starling, S., Tivarus, M., & Bavelier, D. (2013). The neural correlates of statistical learning in a word segmentation task: An fMRI study.Brain and Language, 127(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.007
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Kelso, K., Fletcher, J., & Lee, P. (2007). Reading comprehension in children with specific language impairment: An examination of two subgroups.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820600693013
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Keskin, H. (2013). Impacts of reading metacognitive strategies and reading attitudes on school success.International Journal of Academic Research Part B, 5, 312–317. https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-5/B.48
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax.Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025405
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Kidd, E., & Arciuli, J. (2016). Individual differences in statistical learning predict children's comprehension of syntax.Child Development, 87(1), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12461
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Klem, M., Melby-Lervåg, M., Hagtvet, B., Halass Lyster, S., Gustafsson, J., & Hulme, C. (2014). Sentence repetition is a measure of children's language skills rather than working memory limitations.Developmental Science, 18(1), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12202
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Leclercq, A., Majerus, S., Prigent, G., & Maillart, C. (2013). The impact of dual tasking on sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(1), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0290)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Leonard, L. (2011). The primacy of priming in grammatical learning and intervention: A tutorial.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(2), 608–621. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0122)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Leonard, L. (2014). Children with specific language impairment (2nd ed.). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9152.001.0001
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Leonard, L., Deevy, P., Fey, M., & Bredin-Oja, S. (2013). Sentence comprehension in specific language impairment: A task designed to distinguish between cognitive capacity and syntactic complexity.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(2), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0254)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Leonard, L., Deevy, P., Kurtz, R., Chorev, L., Owen, A., Polite, E., Elam, D., & Finneran, D. (1997). Lexical aspect and the use of verb morphology by children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(3), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/053)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Lieven, E., Salomo, D., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis.Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 481–507. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.022
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Loaiza, V., & Camos, V. (2018). The role of semantic representations in verbal working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(6), 863–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000475
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Lum, J., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2013). Long-term memory: A review and meta-analysis of studies of declarative and procedural memory in specific language impairment.Topics in Language Disorders, 33(4), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TLD.0000437939.01237.6a
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Lum, J., Conti-Ramsden, G., Morgan, A., & Ullman, M. (2014). Procedural learning deficits in specific language impairment (SLI): A meta-analysis of serial reaction time task performance.Cortex, 51, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.10.011
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Lum, J., Youssef, G., & Clark, G. (2017). Using pupillometry to investigate sentence comprehension in children with and without specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(6), 1648–1660. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0158
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Mainela-Arnold, E., Evans, J., & Coady, J. (2010). Beyond capacity limitations: Effects of lexical processes on word recall in verbal working memory tasks in children with and without specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(6), 1656–1672. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/08-0240)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Marinis, T., & van der Lely, H. (2007). On-line processing of wh-questions in children with G-SLI and typically developing children.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42(5), 557–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820601058190
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Marshall, C., Marinis, T., & van der Lely, H. (2007). Passive verb morphology: The effect of phonotactics on passive comprehension in typically developing and grammatical-SLI children.Lingua, 117(8), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.07.001
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.576
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Marton, K., Campanelli, L., Eichorn, N., Scheuer, J., & Yoon, J. (2014). Information processing and proactive interference in children with and without specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0306)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• McCauley, S., & Christiansen, M. (2015). Individual differences in chunking ability predict on-line sentence processing.In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1553–1558). https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2015/papers/0271/paper0271.pdf
  Google Scholar
• McCauley, S., & Christiansen, M. (2014). Acquiring formulaic language: A computational model.The Mental Lexicon, 9(3), 419–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.3.03mcc
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• McCauley, S., & Christiansen, M. (2017). Computational investigations of multiword chunks in language learning.Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12258
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• MacDonald, M., & Christiansen, M. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996).Psychological Review, 109(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• McGregor, K., Oleson, J., Bahnsen, A., & Duff, D. (2013). Children with developmental language impairment have vocabulary deficits characterized by limited breadth and depth.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12008
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review.Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”: Evidence from a meta-analytic review.Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 11(4), 512–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635612
  Google Scholar
• Miller, C., & Deevy, P. (2006). Structural priming in children with and without specific language impairment.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20(5), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200500074339
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Moll, K., Hulme, C., Nag, S., & Snowling, M. (2015). Sentence repetition as a marker of language skills in children with dyslexia.Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000209
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Montag, J., & MacDonald, M. (2015). Text exposure predicts spoken production of complex sentences in 8- and 12-year-old children and adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000054
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery, J. (2000). Relation of working memory to offline and real-time sentence processing in children with specific language impairment.Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(1), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400001065
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery, J. (2008). Role of auditory attention in the real-time processing of simple grammar by children with specific language impairment: A preliminary investigation.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43(5), 499–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820701736638
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery, J., & Evans, J. (2009). Complex sentence comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0116
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery, J., Evans, J., Fargo, J., Schwartz, S., & Gillam, R. (2018). Structural relationship between cognitive processing and syntactic sentence comprehension in children with and without developmental language disorder.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(12), 2950–2976. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0421
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery, J., Evans, J., & Gillam, R. (2009). Relation of auditory attention and complex sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: A preliminary study.Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408090061
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery, J., Evans, J., Gillam, R., Sergeev, A., & Finney, M. (2016). “Whatdunit?” Developmental changes in children's syntactically based sentence comprehension abilities and sensitivity to word order.Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(6), 1281–1309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000570
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery, J., Gillam, R., & Evans, J. (2016). Syntactic versus memory-based accounts of sentence comprehension in children with SLI: Looking back, looking ahead.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(6), 1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0325
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Montgomery, J., Gillam, R., Evans, J., & Sergeev, A. (2017). Whatdunit? Sentence comprehension abilities of children with SLI: Sensitivity to word order in canonical and noncanonical sentences.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(9), 2603–2618. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0025
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Motallebzadeh, K., & Yazdi, M. (2016). The relationship between EFL learners' reading comprehension ability and their fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and processing speed.Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1228733
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Moyle, M., Karasinski, C., Ellis Weismer, S., & Gorman, B. (2011). Grammatical morphology in school-age children with and without language impairment: A discriminant function analysis.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(4), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0029)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues (3rd ed.). Author.
  Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Report of the National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). U.S. Government Printing Office.
  Google Scholar
• Nee, D. E., & Jonides, J. (2013). Trisecting representational states in short-term memory.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00796
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Nelson, N., Plante, E., Helm-Estabrooks, N., & Hotz, G. (2016). Test of Integrated Language and Literacy. Brookes.
  Google Scholar
• Nippold, M. (2017). Reading comprehension deficits in adolescents: Addressing underlying language abilities.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_LSHSS-16-0048
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Nippold, M., Hesketh, L., Duthie, J., & Mansfield, T. (2005). Conversational versus expository discourse: A study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1048–1064. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/073)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Nippold, M., Mansfield, T., Billow, J., & Tomblin, B. (2008). Expository discourse in adolescents with language impairments: Examining syntactic development.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(4), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0049
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Nippold, M., & Schwarz, I. (2002). Do children recover from specific language impairment?.International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040210001669221
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Oetting, J., McDonald, J., Seidel, C., & Hegarty, M. (2016). Sentence recall by children with SLI across two nonmainstream dialects of English.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(1), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0036
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Pickering, M., & Ferreira, V. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Plante, E., Bahl, M., Vance, R., & Gerken, L. (2010). Beyond phonotactic frequency: Presentation frequency effects word productions in specific language impairment.Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.07.005
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Plante, E., & Gómez, R. (2018). Learning without trying: The clinical relevance of statistical learning.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3S), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0131
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Plante, E., Mettler, H., Tucci, A., & Vance, R. (2019). Maximizing treatment efficiency in developmental language disorder: Positive effects in half the time.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1233–1247. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0285
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Cleave, P. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(4), 850–863. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3804.850
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(6), 1412–1431. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4106.1412
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Robertson, E., & Joanisse, M. (2010). Spoken sentence comprehension in children with dyslexia and language impairment: The roles of syntax and working memory.Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409990208
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Roid, G., & Miller, L. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale–Revised.Stoelting. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05120-000
  Google Scholar
• Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children.Developmental Science, 6(5), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00312
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Schrank, F., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt-Riverside.
  Google Scholar
• Schrank, F., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt-Riverside.
  Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2009). A case for the sentence in reading comprehension.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/08-0042)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Scott, C., & Balthazar, C. (2010). The grammar of information: Challenges for older students with language impairments.Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181f90878
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Scott, C., & Balthazar, C. (2013). The role of complex sentence knowledge in children with reading and writing difficulties.Perspectives on Language Literacy, 39(3), 18–30.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• Scott, C., & Stokes, S. (1995). Measures of syntax in school-age children and adolescents.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 26(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2604.309
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Simkin, Z., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2006). Evidence of reading difficulty in subgroups of children with specific language impairment.Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 22(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265659006ct310xx
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Skeide, M., Brauer, J., & Friederici, A. (2014). Syntax gradually segregates from semantics in the developing brain.NeuroImage, 100, 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.080
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Spencer, M., Quinn, J., & Wagner, R. (2014). Specific reading comprehension disability: Major problem, myth, or misnomer?.Learning Disability Research and Practice, 29(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12024
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Squire, L. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective.Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 171–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.005
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Squire, L., Knowlton, B., & Musen, G. (1993). The structure and organization of memory.Annual Review in Psychology, 44, 453–495. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.002321
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Theakston, A., & Lieven, E. (2017). Multiunit sequences in first language acquisition.Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 588–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12268
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Thiessen, E. (2017). What's statistical about learning? Insights from modelling statistical learning as a set of memory processes.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372, 20160056. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0056
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Torkildsen, J., Dailey, N., Aguilar, J., Gómez, R., & Plante, E. (2013). Exemplar variability facilitates rapid learning of an otherwise unlearnable grammar by individuals with language-based learning disability.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(2), 618–629. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0125)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Ullman, M. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model.Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Ullman, M. (2016). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiology model of language learning, knowledge, and use.In G. Hickok & S. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (pp. 953–968). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Ullman, M., & Pierpont, E. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis.Cortex, 41(3), 399–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70276-4
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• van der Lely, H., & Stollwerck, L. (1997). Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children.Cognition, 62(3), 245–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00783-4
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Victorino, K., & Schwartz, R. (2015). Control of auditory attention in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(4), 1245–1257. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0181
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Wells, J., Christiansen, M., Race, D., Acheson, D., & MacDonald, M. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension.Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Whitehouse, A., Watt, H., Line, E., & Bishop, D. (2009). Adult psychosocial outcomes of children with specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and autism.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(4), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820802708098
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Wiig, E., Semel, E., & Secord, W. (2013). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fifth Edition. The Psychological Corporation.
  Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-Y., Vissiennon, K., Friederici, A., & Brauer, J. (2016). Preschoolers' brains rely on semantic cues prior to the mastery of syntax during sentence comprehension.NeuroImage, 126, 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.036
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Zwitserlood, R., Wijnen, F., van Weerdenburg, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). “MetaTaal”: Enhancing complex syntax in children with specific language impairment: A metalinguistic and multimodal approach.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(3), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12131
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar