Augmentative and Alternative Communication in an Elementary School Setting: A Case Study
Publication: Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume 53, Number 1
Pages 167-180
Abstract
Purpose:
Although there is a strong evidence base supporting the use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in school settings, the research-to-practice gap in this area remains a concern. Few studies have examined how AAC systems are implemented in school settings and whether these systems adequately promote communicative competence for students with complex communication needs. The aim of this case study was to better understand the ways in which elementary-age students with complex communication needs used AAC throughout daily routines.
Method:
Observations of five students, four receiving services under the category of autism and one under intellectual disability, in school settings were conducted to document the communication function, type of AAC systems used, and the times and activities during which AAC systems were accessible. In addition, supplemental interviews were conducted to understand the rationale for AAC implementation from the perspective of the special education teacher and speech-language pathologist.
Results:
Overall, findings from the observations and interviews indicated that a variety of AAC modes were utilized. Interactions represented a range of communicative functions, with the exception of social closeness, and were primarily observed during academic activities. However, there were some discrepancies between observations and interview data.
Conclusions:
Although these findings provide insight into how students with complex communication needs may use AAC in elementary school settings, more research is needed to explore AAC use across a range of students, classrooms, and schools. We present specific future research directions, along with implications and recommendations for AAC teams and researchers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Augmentative and alternative communication: Key issues. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/augmentative-and-alternative-communication/#collapse_1
Andzik, N. R., Chung, Y., Doneski-Nicol, J., & Dollarhide, C. T. (2019). AAC services in schools: A special educator's perspective. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 65(2), 89–97.
Andzik, N. R., Chung, Y., & Kranak, M. P. (2016). Communication opportunities for elementary school students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(4), 272–281.
Andzik, N. R., Schaefer, J. M., Nichols, R. T., & Chung, Y. (2018). National survey describing and quantifying students with communication needs. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 21(1), 40–47.
Balandin, S., & Goldbart, J. (2011). Qualitative research and AAC: Strong methods and new topics. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(4), 227–228.
Bambara, L. M., Goh, A., Kern, L., & Caskie, G. (2012). Perceived barriers and enablers to implementing individualized positive behavior interventions and supports in school settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(4), 228–240.
Beukelman, D. R., & Light, J. C. (2020). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Brookes.
Biggs, E. E., Carter, E. W., & Gilson, C. B. (2018). Systematic review of interventions involving aided AAC modeling for children with complex communication needs. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123(5), 443–473.
Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9(3), 1–19.
Brady, N. C., Bruce, S., Goldman, A., Erickson, K., Milneo, B., Ogletree, B. T., Paul, D., Romski, M., Sevcik, R., Siegel, E., Schoonover, J., Snell, M., Sylvester, L., & Wilkinson, K. (2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121–138.
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Rugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207.
Brown, F. E., McDonnell, J. J., & Snell, M. E. (2016). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (8th ed.). Pearson.
Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(2), 111–126.
Chung, Y., Carter, E. W., & Sisco, L. G. (2012). Social interactions of students with disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive classrooms. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117(5), 349–367.
Hanline, M. F., Dennis, L. R., & Warren, A. W. (2018). The outcomes of professional development on AAC use in preschool classrooms. Infants and Young Children, 31(3), 231–245.
Johnston, S. S. (2016). Teaching communication skills. In F. Brown, J. McDonnell, & M. E. Snell (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (8th ed., pp. 404–437). Pearson Education.
Kleinert, H., Towles-Reeves, E., Quenemoen, R., Thurlow, M., Fluegge, L., Weseman, L., & Kerbel, A. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 312–328.
Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4(2), 66–82.
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 1–18.
Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Caron, J. (2019). New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 26–41.
Lund, S. K., Quach, W., Weissling, K., McKelvey, M., & Dietz, A. (2017). Assessment with children who need augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): Clinical decisions of AAC specialists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(1), 56–68.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
McNaughton, D., Light, J., Beukelman, D. R., Klein, C., Nieder, D., & Nazareth, G. (2019). Building capacity in AAC: A person-centered approach to supporting participation by people with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 56–68.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
Morningstar, M. E., Allcock, H. C., White, J. M., Taub, D., Kurth, J. A., Gonsier-Gerdin, J., Ryndak, D. L., Sauer, J., & Jorgensen, C. M. (2016). Inclusive education national research advocacy agenda: A call to action. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(3), 209–215.
Ogletree, B. T., McMurry, S., Schmidt, M., & Evans, K. (2018). The changing world of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): Examining three realities faced by today's AAC provider. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3(12), 113–122.
Raghavendra, P., Olsson, C., Sampson, J., McInerney, R., & Connell, T. (2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(1), 33–43.
Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Snell, M. E., Brady, N., McLean, L., Ogletree, B. T., Sielgel, E., Sylvester, L., Mineo, B., & Paul, D. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115(5), 364–380.
Stoner, J. B., Angell, M. E., & Bailey, R. L. (2010). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive educational settings: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26(2), 122–135.
Walker, V. L., Loman, S. L., Hara, M., Park, K. L., & Strickland-Cohen, M. K. (2018). Examining the inclusion of students with severe disabilities in school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 43(4), 223–238.
Walker, V. L., & Snell, M. E. (2013). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on challenging behavior: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(2), 117–131.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume 53 • Number 1 • January 2022
Pages: 167-180
PubMed: 34902289
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
History
- Received: Apr 28, 2021
- Revised: Jul 31, 2021
- Accepted: Sep 10, 2021
- Published online: Dec 13, 2021
- Published in issue: Jan 5, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Metrics
View all metricsCitations
Download article citation data for:
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Citing Literature
- Sofia Wallin, Gunilla Thunberg, Jenny Wilder, Kompetenta kommunikationspartners gör skillnad: En undersökning av AKKtiv Kompis i anpassad grundskola, Specialpedagogisk forskning och tidiga insatser, 10.16993/bct.t, (413-438), (2025).
- Helena Tegler, 'But I don’t know, she might actually ask?' Detecting sources of self-efficacy and conditions fostering collective teacher efficacy by analysing transcribed panel and group discussions, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 10.1080/08856257.2025.2502460, (1-17), (2025).
- Jorge Eduardo Alfaro-Urrutia, Pamela Pérez-Godoy, Curricular integration of augmentative and alternative communication for students on the autism spectrum in inclusive-oriented schools: A scoping review, Autism, 10.1177/13623613251333834, (2025).
- Imani O. Evans, Christine M. Spence, Wendy J. Rodgers, LaRon A. Scott, A Systematic Literature Review on School-Based Speech-Language Pathology Collaboration Research, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-24-00012, 56, 1, (234-251), (2025).
- George Hitti, Aaron Kavanaugh, Brian Zukotynski, Fabrizio Billi, Management of FSHD symptoms: current assistive technologies and pharmacological approaches, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10.1080/17483107.2024.2431058, 20, 4, (733-741), (2024).
- Andy Smidt, Chloe Wine, Katrina Blyth, Writing Client Case Reports for Publication: A Template to Structure Planning, Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1080/22087168.2023.12370382, 25, 1, (17-21), (2024).
- Helena Tegler, Helen Melander Bowden, Aided-speaking students’ unsolicited questions in teacher-fronted classroom talk: the use of speech-generating devices to ask questions, Classroom Discourse, 10.1080/19463014.2024.2322597, 15, 4, (374-397), (2024).
- Aine M. Mooney Mahan, Allison Bean, Amy Miller Sonntag, Language Sample Analysis to Assess Communicative Competence of Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Communication Disorders Quarterly, 10.1177/15257401231187076, 45, 4, (221-232), (2023).
View Options
Sign In Options
ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.
Member Login