Online Training to Improve Service Provider Implementation of Letter–Sound Correspondence Instruction for Individuals Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Publication: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 31, Number 3
Pages 1114-1132
Abstract
Purpose:
Service providers have limited training in adapting and implementing literacy instruction for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), and therefore, opportunities to participate in phonological-based literacy activities are minimal. An online training was developed to teach service providers how to implement a systematic lesson in letter–sound correspondence (LSC) instruction with high fidelity for individuals who use AAC.
Method:
The Active Implementation Framework was used to guide the investigation of implementation fidelity and intervention effectiveness after service provider completion of an online training in LSC instruction. Study 1 trained five speech-language pathologists, one paraeducator, and six special educators in schools (N = 12), and Study 2 trained four speech-language pathology master's students. Single case across participant methodology was used for both studies with an implementation fidelity checklist to measure changes in instructional behaviors. Additionally, social validity data from service providers were collected. Preliminary data on intervention effectiveness for individuals who use AAC were collected for three LSCs after service providers were trained.
Results:
Prior to the online training, service providers implemented LSC instruction with low fidelity. After the training, 11 service providers in Study 1 and all four speech-pathology master's students in Study 2 demonstrated large gains in implementation fidelity. Eight of the nine individuals who use AAC demonstrated improvement in LSC.
Conclusion:
Access to the online training has the potential to change the implementation behavior of service providers and take steps toward closing the research-to-practice gap surrounding early phonological skill acquisition for individuals who use AAC.
Supplemental Material:
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Aarons, G. A. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6(2), 61–74.
Ainsworth, M. K., Evmenova, A. S., Behrmann, M., & Jerome, M. (2016). Teaching phonics to groups of middle school students with autism, intellectual disabilities and complex communication needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 56, 165–176.
Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford.
Benedek-Wood, E., McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2016). Instruction in letter–sound correspondences for children with autism and limited speech. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(1), 43–54.
Blanchard, C., Livet, M., Ward, C., Sorge, L., Sorensen, T., & McClurg, M. R. (2017). The Active Implementation Frameworks: A roadmap for advancing implementation of comprehensive medication management in primary care. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13(5), 922–929.
Caron, J. (2016). Effects of adapted instruction on the acquisition of letter–sound correspondences and sight words by pre-adolescent/adolescent learners with complex communication needs and autism spectrum disorders [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from ProQuest (10154522).
Caron, J., & Light, J. (2016). “Social media has opened a world of ‘Open communication:’” Experiences of adults with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication and social media. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(1), 25–40.
Caron, J., McNaughton, D., O'Brien, M., Eskin, N., Curtin, E., Brush, L., & Bitner, L. (2018). AAC & adapted literacy instruction: Closing the research-to-practice gap through online training of preservice SLPs. Poster at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Conference, Boston, MA, United States.
Caron, J., O'Brien, M., McNaughton, D., & Weintruab, R. (2021). Online training to support the provision of letter–sound correspondence instruction: Social validity and training development. Manuscript in Preparation.
Chang, V. (2016). Review and discussion: E-learning for academia and industry. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 476–485.
Clark, R. C. (2014). Evidence-based training methods: A guide for training professionals. American Society for Training and Development.
Douglas, S. N., McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). Online training for paraeducators to support the communication of young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(3), 223–242.
Ehri, L. C. (1998). Word reading by sight and by analogy in beginning readers. Reading and Spelling: Development and Disorders, 5, 87–111.
Fallon, K. A., Light, J., McNaughton, D., Drager, K., & Hammer, C. (2004). The effects of direct instruction on the single-word reading skills of children who require augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1424–1439.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2013). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. ASCD.
Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Metz, A., & Van Dyke, M. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 213–230.
Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology (pp. 239–281). Routledge.
Gildroy, P. G. (1999). Teaching letter-name and letter–sound associations. (Module 1, lesson 3). In B. K. Lenz & P. G. Gildroy (Eds.), Beginning word reading. University of Kansas, Center for Research on Learning. http://www2.ku.edu/~onlineacademy/academymodules/a301/
Goldstein, H., Lackey, K. C., & Schneider, N. J. (2014). A new framework for systematic Reviews. Exceptional Children, 80(3), 262–286.
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Hasham, Z. (2010). Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(2), 97–107.
Kilpatrick, D. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing, and overcoming reading difficulties. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38.
Krimm, H., Schuele, M., & Brame, C. (2017). Viability of online learning for ensuring basic skills in speech-language pathology. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 2(10), 49–58.
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2009). Accessible Literacy Learning: Evidence-based reading instruction for learners with autism, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and other disabilities. Dyna-Vox Systems.
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2013). Literacy intervention for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults With Complex Communication Needs, 309–351.
Light, J., McNaughton, D., Weyer, M., & Karg, L. (2008). Evidence-based literacy instruction for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A case study of a student with multiple disabilities. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29(02), 120–132.
Mandak, K., Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2020). The effects of an online training on preservice speech-language pathologists' use of family-centered skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, (3), 29, 1489–1504.
McMillan, D., & Morley, S. (2010). Single case quantitative methods for practice-based evidence. In M. Barkam, G. Hardy, & J. Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence (pp. 109–138). Wiley-Blackwell.
National Implementation Research Network. (2016). The National Implementation Research Network uses the science and practice of implementation to help solve real world problems. https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu
Neal, J. W., Neal, Z. P., Mills, K. J., Lawlor, J. A., & McAlindon, K. (2019). What types of brokerage bridge the research-practice gap? The case of public school educators. Social Networks, 59, 41–49.
Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of All Pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357–367.
Ruppar, A. L., Dymond, S. K., & Gaffney, J. S. (2011). Teachers' perspectives on literacy instruction for students with severe disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3–4), 100–111.
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 265–282.
Shaw, S. R. (2021). Implementing evidence-based practices in school psychology: Excavation by de-implementing the disproved. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 36(2), 91–97.
UNESCO. (2006). Education for all global monitoring report, understanding of literacy. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001416/141639e.pdf
Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis. (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://singlecaseresearch.org/calculators/nap
Westover, J. M. (2010). Increasing the literacy skills of students who require AAC through modified direct instruction and specific instructional feedback [Doctoral dissertation] . ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3240436).
Yorke, A. M. (2017). The effects of explicit instruction in letter–sound correspondences with children with complex communication needs in pairs with peers [Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University] . https://search.proquest.com/docview/1921214463?pq-origsite=gscholar
Yorke, A. M., Caron, J., Pukys, N., Sternad, E., Grecoi, C., & Shermak, C. (2021). Foundational reading interventions adapted for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): A systematic review of the research. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 33(4), 537–582.
Zangari, C. (2016). Looking back to move forward: 25 years of thinking about AAC and language. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1(12), 144–152.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 31 • Number 3 • May 2022
Pages: 1114-1132
PubMed: 35333593
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
History
- Received: May 14, 2021
- Revised: Nov 10, 2021
- Accepted: Jan 6, 2022
- Published online: Mar 25, 2022
- Published in issue: May 10, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Metrics
View all metricsCitations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Citing Literature
- Jessica G. Caron, Nicole Ryan, Salena Babb, Christine Holyfield, Meghan O’Brien, Effect of explicit literacy instruction on letter-sound correspondence acquisition for a child with cerebral palsy who uses AAC eye gaze, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10.1080/07434618.2025.2466166, (1-12), (2025).
- Savanna Brittlebank, Janice Light, Implementing a Transition-to-Literacy Decoding Feature via Telepractice to Support Single-Word Reading by a Young Boy With Down Syndrome: A Case Study, Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 10.1044/2024_PERSP-24-00158, 0, 0, (1-17), (2025).
- Kevin M. Pitt, Miechelle McKelvey, Kristy Weissling, Amber Thiessen, Brain-computer interface for augmentative and alternative communication access: The initial training needs and learning preferences of speech-language pathologists, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1080/17549507.2024.2363939, 27, 1, (14-22), (2024).
- Raquel Lazarowitz, Doaa Taqi, Cassandra Lee, Jill Boruff, Kimberly McBain, Annette Majnemer, André Bussières, Noémi Dahan-Oliel, Knowledge Translation Interventions to Increase the Uptake of Evidence-Based Practice Among Pediatric Rehabilitation Professionals: A Systematic Review, Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, 10.1080/01942638.2024.2421854, 45, 2, (119-152), (2024).
- Christine Holyfield, Lauramarie Pope, Janice Light, Erik Jakobs, Emily Laubscher, David McNaughton, Olivia Pfaff, Effects of an AAC feature on decoding and encoding skills of adults with Down syndrome, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10.1080/07434618.2023.2266025, 40, 2, (140-154), (2023).
- Emily D. Quinn, Kim Kurin, Kristi L. Atkins, Alexandria Cook, Identifying Implementation Strategies to Increase Augmentative and Alternative Communication Adoption in Early Childhood Classrooms: A Qualitative Study, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2023_LSHSS-22-00186, 54, 4, (1136-1154), (2023).
- Christine Holyfield, Lauramarie Pope, Janice Light, Erik Jakobs, Emily Laubscher, David McNaughton, Olivia Pfaff, Effects of an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Technology Decoding Feature on Single-Word Reading by Individuals With Down Syndrome and Limited Functional Speech, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00255, 32, 3, (1195-1211), (2023).
- Meghan M. Davidson, Megan A. Morris, Epilogue: Implementation Science in CSD and Starting Where You Are, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00010, 31, 3, (1179-1187), (2022).
- Meghan M. Davidson, Crystle N. Alonzo, Andrea Barton-Hulsey, Cathy Binger, Mindy Bridges, Jessica Caron, Natalie F. Douglas, Julie L. Feuerstein, Lesley Olswang, Jennifer Y. Oshita, Megan E. Schliep, Emily Quinn, Megan A. Morris, Prologue: Implementation Science in CSD and Starting Where You Are, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00009, 31, 3, (1023-1025), (2022).
View Options
Sign In Options
ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.
Member Login