No access
Research Article
17 August 2023

Vowel Acoustics as Predictors of Speech Intelligibility in Dysarthria

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 66, Number 8S
Pages 3100-3114

Abstract

Purpose:

This study sought to determine if alternative vowel space area (VSA) measures (i.e., novel trajectory-based measures: vowel space hull area and vowel space density) predicted speech intelligibility to the same extent as two traditional vowel measures (i.e., token-based measures: VSA and corner dispersion) in speakers with dysarthria. Additionally, this study examined if the strength of the relationship between acoustic vowel measures and intelligibility differed based on how intelligibility was measured (i.e., orthographic transcriptions [OTs] and visual analog scale [VAS] ratings).

Method:

The Grandfather Passage was read aloud by 40 speakers with dysarthria of varying etiologies, including Parkinson's disease (n = 10), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n = 10), Huntington's disease (n = 10), and cerebellar ataxia (n = 10). Token- and trajectory-based acoustic vowel measures were calculated from the passage. Naïve listeners (N = 140) were recruited via crowdsourcing to provide OTs and VAS intelligibility ratings. Hierarchical linear regression models were created to model OTs and VAS intelligibility ratings using the acoustic vowel measures as predictors.

Results:

Traditional VSA was the sole significant predictor of speech intelligibility for both the OTs (R 2 = .259) and VAS (R 2 = .236) models. In contrast, the trajectory-based measures were not significant predictors of intelligibility. Additionally, the OTs and VAS intelligibility ratings conveyed similar information.

Conclusions:

The findings suggest that traditional token-based vowel measures better predict intelligibility than trajectory-based measures. Additionally, the findings suggest that VAS methods are comparable to OT methods for estimating speech intelligibility for research purposes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Berger, D. E. (2004). Using regression analysis. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 479–505). Jossey-Bass.
Boersma, W., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.2.10) [Computer software] . http://www.praat.org/
Borrie, S. A., Barrett, T. S., & Yoho, S. E. (2019). Autoscore: An open-source automated tool for scoring listener perception of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(1), 392–399.
Chiu, Y.-F., & Neel, A. (2020). Predicting intelligibility deficits in Parkinson's disease with perceptual speech ratings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(2), 433–443.
Clopper, C. G. (2009). Computational methods for normalizing acoustic vowel data for talker differences. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(6), 1430–1442.
DuHadway, C. M., & Hustad, K. C. (2012). Contributors to intelligibility in preschool-aged children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 20(4), 11.
Duong, T. (2007). ks: Kernel density estimation and kernel discriminant analysis for multivariate data in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(7), 1–16.
Fox, R. A., & Jacewicz, E. (2017). Reconceptualizing the vowel space in analyzing regional dialect variation and sound change in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(1), 444–459.
Harrell, F. E., Jr. (2022). Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous (Version 4.7-0) [R package] . https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/index.html
Higgins, C. M., & Hodge, M. M. (2002). Vowel area and intelligibility in children with and without dysarthria. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 10(4), 271–277.
Kent, R. D., & Kim, Y-J. (2003). Toward an acoustic typology of motor speech disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17(6), 427–445.
Kim, H., Hasegawa-Johnson, M., & Perlman, A. (2011). Vowel contrast and speech intelligibility in dysarthria. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 63(4), 187–194.
Kim, Y-J. (2017). Acoustic characteristics of fricatives /s/ and /∫/ produced by speakers with Parkinson's disease. Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders, 2(1), 7–14.
Kim, Y-J., Kent, R. D., & Weismer, G. (2011). An acoustic study of the relationships among neurologic disease, dysarthria type, and severity of dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(2), 417–429.
Kim, Y-J., Weismer, G., Kent, R. D., & Duffy, J. R. (2009). Statistical models of F2 slope in relation to severity of dysarthria. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 61(6), 329–335.
King, J. M., Watson, M., & Lof, G. L. (2012). Practice patterns of speech-language pathologists assessing intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 1–10.
Lam, J., & Tjaden, K. (2016). Clear speech variants: An acoustic study in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(4), 631–646.
Lansford, K. L., & Liss, J. M. (2014a). Vowel acoustics in dysarthria: Mapping to perception. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(1), 68–80.
Lansford, K. L., & Liss, J. M. (2014b). Vowel acoustics in dysarthria: Speech disorder diagnosis and classification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(1), 57–67.
Lee, J., Littlejohn, M. A., & Simmons, Z. (2016). Acoustic and tongue kinematic vowel space in speakers with and without dysarthria. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 195–204.
Liss, J. M., Utianski, R., & Lansford, K. (2013). Crosslinguistic application of English-centric rhythm descriptors in motor speech disorders. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 65(1), 3–19.
Liu, H.-M., Tsao, F.-M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2005). The effect of reduced vowel working space on speech intelligibility in Mandarin-speaking young adults with cerebral palsy. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(6), 3879–3889.
Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D. (2021). performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. The Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139.
McRae, P. A., Tjaden, K., & Schoonings, B. (2002). Acoustic and perceptual consequences of articulatory rate change in Parkinson disease. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(1), 35–50.
Milenkovic, P. (2004). TF32 [Computer program] . University of Wisconsin–Madison. https://ubeam.engr.wisc.edu/
Neel, A. T. (2008). Vowel space characteristics and vowel identification accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(3), 574–585.
Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27.
Qualtrics. (2022). Qualtrics. https://www.qualtrics.com
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Rosen, K. M., Goozée, J. V., & Murdoch, B. E. (2008). Examining the effects of multiple sclerosis on speech production: Does phonetic structure matter? Journal of Communication Disorders, 41(1), 49–69.
Roussel, J.-R., Barber, C., Habel, K., Grasman, R., Gramacy, R. B., Mozharovskyi, P., & Sterratt, D. C. (2022). geometry: Mesh generation and surface tessellation. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geometry/index.html
Rusz, J., Klempíř, J., Tykalová, T., Baborová, E., Čmejla, R., Růžička, E., & Roth, J. (2014). Characteristics and occurrence of speech impairment in Huntington's disease: Possible influence of antipsychotic medication. Journal of Neural Transmission, 121(12), 1529–1539.
Sandoval, S., Berisha, V., Utianski, R. L., Liss, J. M., & Spanias, A. (2013). Automatic assessment of vowel space area. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(5), EL477–EL483.
Sapir, S., Ramig, L. O., Spielman, J. L., & Fox, C. (2010). Formant centralization ratio: A proposal for a new acoustic measure of dysarthric speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(1), 114–125.
Skodda, S., Visser, W., & Schlegel, U. (2011). Vowel articulation in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Voice, 25(4), 467–472.
Stipancic, K. L., Tjaden, K., & Wilding, G. (2016). Comparison of intelligibility measures for adults with Parkinson's disease, adults with multiple sclerosis, and healthy controls. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(2), 230–238.
Story, B. H., & Bunton, K. (2017). Vowel space density as an indicator of speech performance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(5), EL458–EL464.
Tjaden, K., Lam, J., & Wilding, G. (2013). Vowel acoustics in Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis: Comparison of clear, loud, and slow speaking conditions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(5), 1485–1502.
Tjaden, K., Sussman, J., & Wilding, G. E. (2014). Impact of clear, loud, and slow speech on scaled intelligibility and speech severity in Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 779–792.
Tjaden, K., & Wilding, G. E. (2004). Rate and loudness manipulations in dysarthria: Acoustic and perceptual findings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(4), 766–783.
Turner, G. S., Tjaden, K., & Weismer, G. (1995). The influence of speaking rate on vowel space and speech intelligibility for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(5), 1001–1013.
Weismer, G., Jeng, J.-Y., Laures, J. S., Kent, R. D., & Kent, J. F. (2001). Acoustic and intelligibility characteristics of sentence production in neurogenic speech disorders. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 53(1), 1–18.
Weismer, G., Yunusova, Y., & Bunton, K. (2012). Measures to evaluate the effects of DBS on speech production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25(2), 74–94.
Whitfield, J. A., Dromey, C., & Palmer, P. (2018). Examining acoustic and kinematic measures of articulatory working space: Effects of speech intensity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(5), 1104–1117.
Whitfield, J. A., & Goberman, A. M. (2014). Articulatory–acoustic vowel space: Application to clear speech in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Journal of Communication Disorders, 51, 19–28.
Whitfield, J. A., & Mehta, D. D. (2019). Examination of clear speech in Parkinson disease using measures of working vowel space. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(7), 2082–2098.
Wickham, H., & Wickham, M. H. (2016). scales: Scale functions for visualization. https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016-06-13/web/packages/scales/index.html
Zraick, R. I., Kempster, G. B., Connor, N. P., Thibeault, S., Klaben, B. K., Bursac, Z., Thrush, C. R., & Glaze, L. E. (2011). Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 14–22.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 66Number 8SAugust 2023
Pages: 3100-3114
PubMed: 36795536

History

  • Received: May 18, 2022
  • Revised: Sep 27, 2022
  • Accepted: Dec 12, 2022
  • Published online: Feb 16, 2023
  • Published in issue: Aug 17, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

School of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee
School of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee
School of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee
School of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing financial or nonfinancial interests existed at the time of publication.
Correspondence to Austin Thompson: [email protected]
Editor-in-Chief: Mili Kuruvilla-Dugdale
Editor: Caroline Niziolek
Publisher Note: This article is part of the Special Issue: Select Papers From the 2022 Conference on Motor Speech—Basic Science and Clinical Innovation.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Changes to Mandarin vowel and lexical tone acoustics in clear speech production, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10.1121/10.0036645, 157, 5, (3561-3571), (2025).
  • Perceptual and acoustic predictors of speech intelligibility among Hebrew-speaking young adults with down syndrome, Journal of Communication Disorders, 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106529, 115, (106529), (2025).
  • Acoustic and Kinematic Predictors of Intelligibility and Articulatory Precision in Parkinson's Disease, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00153, 67, 10, (3595-3611), (2024).
  • Effect of ‘Be Clear’ Treatment on Intelligibility in Adults with Post-Stroke Dysarthria: Acoustic-Perceptual Consequences, Communication Disorders Quarterly, 10.1177/15257401241265272, (2024).
  • Acoustic Effects of Speaker Sex, Speech Sample, and Mandarin Tone on Vowel Production of Poststroke Spastic Dysarthria, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 10.1159/000538554, 76, 6, (548-561), (2024).
  • Speech disorders in patients with Tongue squamous cell carcinoma: A longitudinal observational study based on a questionnaire and acoustic analysis, BMC Oral Health, 10.1186/s12903-023-02888-1, 23, 1, (2023).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share