Abstract
Purpose:
The purposes of this tutorial are (a) to describe a method of language sample analysis (LSA) referred to as SUGAR (Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised) and (b) to offer step-by-step instructions detailing how to collect, transcribe, analyze, and interpret the results of a SUGAR language sample.
Method:
The tutorial begins with an overview of current LSA use, including barriers to clinical implementation, followed by an overview of the SUGAR method. Next, the SUGAR method is described in detail, including collecting the sample, transcribing the sample, analyzing the sample, and interpreting the results. To illustrate the method, each section includes an accompanying appendix that provides an example of a sample transcript and the various analyses.
Conclusions:
SUGAR offers speech-language pathologists one way to conduct LSA that is cost free, valid, and efficient. Clinicians can collect, transcribe, and analyze samples in approximately 21 min. The results of a SUGAR analysis can be used to document the presence of a language impairment, obtain a detailed description of a child's conversational language use, identify intervention targets, and develop intervention goals.
References
-
Benway, N. R., Owens, R. E., & Pavelko, S. L. (2021). Introducing SPOON: Automated SUGAR language sample analysis[Conference session] . American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention. https://www.eventscribe.net/2021/ASHAVirtualLibrary/index.asp?presTarget=1839016 -
Casby, M. W. (2011). An examination of the relationship of sample size and mean length of utterance for children with developmental language impairment.Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 27(3), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659010394387 -
Cleveland, L. H., & Oetting, J. B. (2013). Children's marking of verbal –s by nonmainstream English dialect and clinical status.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(4), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0122) - Connecticut State Department of Education. (2008). Guidelines for speech and language programs: Determining eligibility for special education speech and language services under IDEA. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/SDE/Special-Education/speech_language_2008.pdf
- Florida Department of Education. (2010). Exceptional student education eligibility for students with language impairments. https://info.fldoe.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-5952/dps-2010-179.pdf
-
Horton-Ikard, R. (2010). Language sample analysis with children who speak non-mainstream dialects of English.Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 17(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1044/lle17.1.16 -
Leonard, L. B. (2014). Children with specific language impairment (2nd ed.). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9152.001.0001 -
Levickis, P., Reilly, S., Girolametto, L., Ukoumunne, O. C., & Wake, M. (2014). Maternal behaviors promoting language acquisition in slow-to-talk toddlers: Prospective community-based study.Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 35(4), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000056 -
J. F. Miller, K. Andriacchi, & A. Nockerts (Eds.). (2015). Assessing language production using SALT software: A clinician's guide to language sample analysis. SALT Software LLC. -
Oetting, J. B., Berry, J. R., Gregory, K. D., Rivière, A. M., & McDonald, J. (2019). Specific language impairment in African American English and Southern White English: Measures of tense and agreement with dialect-informed probes and strategic scoring.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(9), 3443–3461. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0089 -
Oetting, J. B., & Garrity, A. W. (2006). Variation within dialects: A case of Cajun/Creole influence within child SAAE and SWE.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/002) -
Overton, C., Baron, T., Pearson, B. Z., & Ratner, N. B. (2021). Using free computer-assisted language sample analysis to evaluate and set treatment goals for children who speak African American English.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00107 -
Owens, R. E., & Pavelko, S. L. (2017). Relationships among conversational language samples and norm-referenced test scores.Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders, 2(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.21849/cacd.2017.00052 -
Owens, R. E., Jr., & Pavelko, S. L. (2020). Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised (SUGAR): Quantitative values for language sample analysis measures in 7- to 11-year-old children.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(3), 734–744. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00027 -
Owens, R. E., Jr., Pavelko, S. L., & Bambinell, D. (2018). Moving beyond mean length of utterance: Analyzing language samples to identify intervention targets.Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG1.5 -
Pavelko, S. L., Owens, R. E., Jr., Ireland, M., & Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (2016). Use of language sample analysis by school based SLPs: Results of a nationwide survey.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 47(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0044 -
Pavelko, S. L., & Owens, R. E., Jr. (2017). Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised (SUGAR): New normative values for language sample analysis measures.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0022 -
Pavelko, S. L., & Owens, R. E., Jr. (2019). Diagnostic accuracy of the Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised (SUGAR) measures for identifying children with language impairment.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0050 -
Pavelko, S. L., Price, L. R., & Owens, R. E., Jr. (2020). Revisiting reliability: Using SUGAR to compare 25- and 50-utterance language samples.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(3), 778–794. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00026 -
Retherford, K. (2007). Guide to analysis of language transcripts (3rd ed.). Pro-Ed. - Virginia Department of Education. (2011). Speech-language pathology services in schools: Guidelines for best practice. http://www.doe.virginia.gov/special_ed/disabilities/speech_language_impairment/speech_lang_pathology_services.pdf
Add to your Mendeley library