Abstract

This article focuses on culturally responsive AAC practice. Including parents in the process is essential to ensure that children with significant communication impairments receive the most appropriate communication tool and the most effective intervention strategies. Often, the roles expected or demanded from parents may conflict with the values, expectations, and abilities of many families, particularly those from culturally diverse backgrounds, which may contribute to low levels of participation. If clinicians are to work effectively with families from a range of different backgrounds, they need not only a greater understanding of culture and cultural values as they relate to AAC, but an increased awareness of the cultural influences affecting their own practices and recommendations. In this article, I describe the process of culturally responsive assessment and intervention and discuss the need for professionals to build opportunities for a truly reciprocal collaborative relationship with families.

References

  • Angelo, D. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(1), 37–47.
  • Bailey, R. L., Parette, H. P., Stoner, J. B., Angell, M. E., & Carroll, K. (2006). Family members' perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use.Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 50–60.
  • Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Berens, J., del Campo, S., & Rivera, D. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 323–328.
  • Bridges, S., & Midgette, S. (2000). Augmentative/alternative communication and assistive technology.In T. Coleman (Ed.), Clinical management of communication disorders in culturally diverse children. (pp. 285–333). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Feltmate, K., & Kay-Raining Bird, E. (2008). Language learning in four bilingual children with Down Syndrome: A detailed analysis of vocabulary and morphosyntax.Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 32, 6–20.
  • Goode, S. (2006). Assistive technology and diversity.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26, 51–54.
  • Hambly, C., & Fombone, E. (2012). The impact of bilingual environments on language development in children with autism spectrum disorders.Journal of Autism and other Developmental Disorders, 42, 1342–1352.
  • Huer, M. (1997). Culturally inclusive assessments for children using augmentative and alternative communication.Journal of Children's Communication Development, 19(1), 23–34.
  • Hwa-Froelich, D. A., & Vigil, D. C. (2004). Three aspects of cultural influence on communication: A literature review.Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25, 107–118.
  • Kalyanpur, M., & Harry, B. (1999). Culture in special education: Building reciprocal family-professional relationships. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Kemp, C., & Parette, H. (2000). Barriers to minority family involvement in assistive technology decision-making processes.Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 384–392.
  • Kummerer, S. E., & Lopez-Reyna, N. A. (2006). The role of Mexican immigrant mothers' beliefs on parental involvement in speech-language therapy.Communication Disorders Quarterly, 27, 83–94.
  • Kummerer, S. E. (2012). Promising strategies for collaborating with Hispanic parents during family-centered speech-language intervention.Communication Disorders Quarterly, 33, 84–95.
  • McCord, M. S., & Soto, G. (2004). Perceptions of AAC: An ethnographic investigation of Mexican-American families.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 209–227.
  • Nunes, D., & Hanline, M. F. (2007). Enhancing the alternative and augmentative communication use of a child with autism through a parent-implemented naturalistic intervention.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54, 177–197.
  • Parette, H. P., Brotherson, M. J., & Huer, M. B. (2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making.Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35(2), 177–190.
  • Pickl, G. (2011). Communication intervention in children with severe disabilities and multilingual backgrounds: Perceptions of pedagogues and parents.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 229–244.
  • Soto, G., Huer, M., & Taylor, O. (1997). Multicultural issues.In L. Lloyd, D. Fuller, & H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 406–413) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Soto, G., Solomon-Rice, P., & Caputo, M. (2009). Enhancing the personal narrative skills of elementary school-aged students who use AAC: The effectiveness of personal narrative intervention.Journal of Communication Disorders, 42, 43–57.
  • Soto, G., & Wine-Seligman, W. (2003). Child-driven development of alternative communication: A case study.In S. von Tetzchner, & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Developmental issues (pp. 211–228). London, England: Whurr.
  • Stuart, S., & Parette, H. P. (2002). Native Americans and augmentative and alternative communication issues.Multiple Voices, 5(1), 38–53.
  • Trainor, A. A. (2010). Reexamining the promise of parent participation in special education: An analysis of cultural and social capital.Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 41, 245–263.
  • von Tetzchner, S., & Grove, N. (2002). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Developmental issues. London, England: Whurr.
  • Yu, B.(in press). Issues in bilingualism and heritage language maintenance: Perspectives of minority-language mothers of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.American Journal of Speech Language Pathology.
  • Yu, B., & Kashinath, S. (2011). Family-centered care and other labors of love: Culturally competent service delivery for young children and their families.CSHA Magazine, 41(1), 12–13.

Additional Resources