No access
Research Article
Research Article
June 1990

Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP)

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 33, Number 2
Pages 343-357

Abstract

This paper reports the development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP), a 66-item self-administered inventory that quantifies performance with a hearing aid in everyday life using both seven-score and four-score profiles. The profiles assess experience with amplification in terms of speech communication in three types of listening situations and in terms of reactions to amplified environmental sounds. The PHAP has been evaluated using groups consisting mainly of elderly hearing aid wearers having mild to moderate hearing impairments. Internal consistency reliability of the scales and subscales ranges from .70 to .91. Test-retest correlations range from .66 to .88. Ninety percent and 95% critical differences are presented to facilitate evaluation of differences between scores for the same individual under different conditions. It is envisioned that the PHAP will have its principal application in research evaluating and comparing different approaches to hearing aid fittings. In addition, the inventory can be used clinically to assess existing hearing aid fittings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

REFERENCES

American National Standard Institute (1969). Specification for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1969). New York: ANSI.
Angevine, O. L. (1975). Individual differences in the annoyance of noise. Sound & Vibration, 9, 40–42.
Barcham, L. J., & Stephens, S. D. G. (1980). The use of an open-ended problems questionnaire in auditory rehabilitation. British Journal of Audiology, 14, 49–51.
Berger, K. W., Abel, D., Hagberg, E., Puzz, L., Varawas, D., & Weldele, F. J. (1982). Successes and problems of hearing aid users. Hearing Aid Journal, 35(12), 26–30.
Brooks, D. N. (1985). Factors relating to the under-use of postaural aids. British Journal of Audiology, 19, 211–217.
Cox, R. M., Alexander, G. C., & Gilmore, C. (1987). Intelligibility of average talkers in typical listening environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 1598–1608.
Chung, S. M., & Stevens, S. D. G. (1986). Factors influencing binaural hearing aid use. British Journal of Audiology, 20, 129–140.
Demorest, M. E., & Erdman, S. A. (1986). Scale composition and item analysis of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 515–535.
Demorest, M. E., & Erdman, S. A. (1987). Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 129–143.
Demorest, M. E., & Erdman, S. A. (1988). Retest stability of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. Ear and Hearing, 9, 237–242.
Demorest, M. E., & Walden, B. E. (1984). Psychometric principles in the selection, interpretation, and evaluation of communication self-assessment inventories. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 226–240.
Franks, J. R., & Beckman, N. J. (1985). Rejection of hearing aids: Attitudes of a geriatric sample. Ear and Hearing, 6, 161–166.
Giolas, T. G., Owens, E., Lamb, S. H., & Schubert, E. D. (1979). Hearing Performance Inventory. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 44, 169–195.
Graeven, D. B. (1975). Necessity, control and predictability of noise annoyance. Journal of Social Psychology, 95, 85–90.
Hagerman, B., & Gabrielsson, A. (1984). Questionnaires on desirable properties of hearing aids. (Report TA109). Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, Department of Technical Audiology.
Helfer, K. S. (1989, October). Aging influences on consonant confusions in reverberation and noise. Asha, 31, 125.
High, W. S., Fairbanks, G., & Glorig, A. (1964). Scale for self-assessment of hearing handicap. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 29, 215–230.
Hutton, C. A. (1987). A problem-oriented questionnaire for rehabilitative audiology. Hearing Journal, 40(10), 47–52.
Nabelek, A. (1988). Identification of vowels in quiet, noise, and reverberation: Relationships with age and hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 476–484.
Nabelek, A. (1989). Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1259–1265.
Newman, C. W., & Weinstein, B. E. (1988). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear and Hearing, 9, 81–85.
Norusis, M.J. (1988). SPSS/PC+ advanced statistics V2.0 (Computer program manual). Chicago, IL: SPSS.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tannahill, J. C. (1979). The Hearing Handicap Scale as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, XLIV, 91–99.
Ventry, I. M., & Weinstein, B. E. (1982). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: A new tool. Ear and Hearing, 3, 128–134.
Walden, B. E., Demorest, M. E., & Hepler, E. L. (1984). Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 49–56.
Weinstein, B. N. (1978). Individual differences in reactions to noise: A longitudinal study in a college dormitory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 458–466.
Weinstein, B. E., Spitzer, J. B., & Ventry, I. M. (1986). Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. Ear and Hearing, 7, 295–299.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 33Number 2June 1990
Pages: 343-357

History

  • Received: Jul 31, 1989
  • Accepted: Dec 29, 1989
  • Published in issue: Jun 1, 1990

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. hearing aids
  2. questionnaire
  3. hearing aid performance
  4. hearing aid benefit
  5. profile

Authors

Affiliations

Robyn M. Cox
Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Memphis State University, and Veteran’s Administration Medical Center, Memphis, TN.
Christine Gilmore
Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Memphis State University, and Veteran’s Administration Medical Center, Memphis, TN.

Notes

Requests for reprints should be sent to Robyn M. Cox, Memphis State University, Memphis Speech & Hearing Center, 807 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, TN 38105.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Adaptation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) in Hindi, The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 10.1186/s43163-024-00702-5, 40, 1, (2024).
  • Patient-Reported Functional Impairment Due to Hearing Loss and Tinnitus After Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.22.01456, 41, 12, (2211-2226), (2023).
  • Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hearing Aid Benefit and Satisfaction: Content Validity and Readability, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00535, 66, 10, (4117-4136), (2023).
  • Most-Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within Otolaryngology—Revisiting the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4703, 149, 3, (261), (2023).
  • Do we need audiogram-based prescriptions? A systematic review, International Journal of Audiology, 10.1080/14992027.2022.2064925, 62, 6, (500-511), (2022).
  • Analysis of Equivalence and Reliability of Korean Translated Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefits, Audiology and Speech Research, 10.21848/asr.200025, 16, 3, (175-187), (2020).
  • Development of Korean Version of Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit-Quick Version, Audiology and Speech Research, 10.21848/asr.200008, 16, 3, (196-205), (2020).
  • Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids, Trends in Hearing, 10.1177/2331216519900589, 24, (2020).
  • Amplification performance outcome: a self-assessment outcome measure for hearing aid users in Greece, Hearing, Balance and Communication, 10.1080/21695717.2020.1727213, 18, 2, (105-115), (2020).
  • Common Configurations of Real-Ear Aided Response Targets Prescribed by NAL-NL2 for Older Adults With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss, American Journal of Audiology, 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00025, 29, 3, (460-475), (2020).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share