Modulation Detection, Modulation Masking, and Speech Understanding in Noise in the Elderly
Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 35, Number 6
Pages 1410-1421
Abstract
Temporal processing of suprathreshold sounds was examined in a group of young normalhearing subjects (mean age of 26.0 years), and in three groups of older subjects (mean ages of 54.3, 64.8, and 72.2 years) with normal hearing or mild sensorineural hearing loss. Three experiments were performed. In the first experiment (modulation detection), subjects were asked to detect sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) of a broadband noise, for modulation frequencies ranging from 2–1024 Hz. In the second experiment (modulation masking), the task was to detect a SAM signal (modulation frequency of 8 Hz) in the presence of a 100%-modulated SAM masker. Masker modulation frequency ranged from 2–64 Hz. In the final experiment, speech understanding was measured as a function of signal-to-noise ratio in both an unmodulated background noise and in a SAM background noise that had a modulation frequency of 8 Hz and a modulation depth of 100%. Except for a very modest correlation between age and modulation detection sensitivity at low modulation frequencies, there were no significant effects of age once the effect of hearing loss was taken into account. The results of the experiments suggest, however, that subjects with even a mild sensorineural hearing loss may have difficulty with a modulation masking task, and may not understand speech as well as normal-hearing subjects do in a modulated noise background.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Abel, S. M., Krever, E. M., & Alberti, P. W.(1990). Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. Scandinavian Audiology, 19,43–54.
American National Standards Institute. (1969). Specifications tor audiometers (ANSI S3.6–1969). New York: ANSI.
Bacon, S. P., & Gleltman, R. M. (1992). Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 642–653.
Bacon, S. P., & Grantham, D. W. (1989). Modulation masking: Effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2575–2580.
Bacon, S. P., & Grantham, D. W. (1992). Fringe effects in modulation masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 3451–3455.
Bacon, S. P., & Viemeister, N. F. (1985). Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology, 24, 117–134.
Bergman, M. (1971). Hearing and aging. Audiology, 10,164–171.
Carhart, R., Tillman T. W. & Greetls, E. S.(1969). Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 694–703.
Corso, J. F., Wright, H. N., & Valerio, M. (1976). Auditory temporal summation in presbycusis and noise exposure. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 58–63.
Dreschler, W. A., & Leeuw, A. R. (1990). Speech reception in reverberation related to temporal resolution. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 181–187.
Dubno, J. R., & Dirks, D. D. (1990). Associations among frequency and temporal resolution and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Oto-laryngologica, Supplement 469, 23–29.
Dubno, J. R., Dirks, D. D., & Morgan, D. E. (1984). Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 87–96.
Duquesnoy, A. J. (1983a). Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 739–743.
Duquesnoy, A. J. (1983b). The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74,1136–1144.
Duquesnoy, A. J., & Plomp, R. (1980). Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 537–544.
Feldman, R. M., & Reger, S. N. (1967). Relations among hearing, reaction time, and age. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 479–495.
Fasten, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1983). Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 652–662.
Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1990). Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1725–1736.
Findlay, R. C., & Denenberg, L. J. (1977). Effects of subtle midfrequency auditory dysfunction upon speech discrimination in noise. Audiology, 16, 252–259.
Florentine, M., & Buus, S. (1984). Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27,449–455.
Formby, C. (1985). Differential sensitivity to tonal frequency and to the rate of modulation of broad-band noise by normally hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78,70–77.
Formby, C. (1987). Modulation threshold functions for chronically impaired Menière patients. Audiology, 26, 89–102.
Formby, C., & Muir, K. (1988). Modulation and gap detection for broadband and filtered noise signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 545–550.
Gelfand, S. A., Piper, N., & Silman, S. (1986). Consonant recognition in quiet and in noise with aging among normal hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80,1589–1598.
Goetzinger, C. P., Proud, G. O., Dirks, D., & Embrey, J. (1961). A study of hearing in advanced age. Archives of Otolaryngology, 73, 662–673.
Gordon-Salant, S. (1985). Phoneme feature perception in noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 87–95.
Gordon-Salant, S. (1987). Age-related differences in speech recognition performance as a function of test format and paradigm. Ear and Hearing, 8, 277–282.
Grady, C. L., Grimes, A. M., Pikus, A., Schwartz, M., Rapoport, S. I., & Cutler, N. R. (1984). Alterations in auditory processing of speech stimuli during aging in healthy subjects. Cortex, 20, 101–110.
Grantham, W. P., & Bacon, S. P. (1991). Binaural modulation masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 1340–1349.
Harris, R. W., & Reitz, M. L. (1985). Effects of room reverberation and noise on speech discrimination by the elderly. Audiology, 24, 319–324.
Heifer, K. S., & Huntley, R. A. (1991). Aging and consonant errors in reverberation and noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 1786–1796.
Heifer, K. S., & Wilber, L. A. (1990). Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 149–155.
Henderson, D., Saivi, R., Pavek, G., & Hamernik, R. (1984). Amplitude modulation thresholds in chinchillas with high-frequency hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1177–1183.
Hintze, J. L. (1987). Number Cruncher Statistical System V5.01 [Computer program.] (Kaysville, Utah).
Houtgast, T. (1989). Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1676–1680.
Houtgast, T., & Steeneken, H. J. M. (1973). The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility. Acustica, 28, 66–73.
Houtgast, T., & Steeneken, H. J. M.(1985). A review of the MTFconcept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77,1069–1077.
Houtgast, T., Steeneken, H. J. M., & Plomp, R. (1980). Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function. I. General room acoustics. Acustica, 46, 60–72.
Humes, L. E., & Christopherson, L. (1991). Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: The contributions of auditory processing deficits. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 686–693.
Humes, L. E., Nelson, K. J., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Recognition of synthetic speech by hearing-impaired elderly listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34,1180–1184.
Humes, L. E., & Roberts, L. (1990). Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: The contributions of audibility. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 726–735.
Jokinen, K. (1973). Presbyacusis VI. Masking of speech. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 76,426–430.
Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., & Elliott, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337–1351.
Kasden, S. D. (1970). Speech discrimination in two age groups matched for hearing loss. Journal of Auditory Research, 10, 210–212.
Levitt, H. (1991). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467–477.
Ludlow, C. L., Cudahy, E. A., & Bassich, C. J. (1982). Developmental, age, and sex effects on gap detection and temporal order. Paper presented at the 103rd Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Chicago, IL.
Luterman, D. M., Welsh, O. L., & Melrose, J. (1966). Responses of aged males to time-altered speech stimuli. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 9, 226–230.
Lutman, M. E. (1991). Degradations in frequency and temporal resolution with age and their impact on speech identification. Acta Oto-laryngologica, Supplement 476, 120–126.
Lutman, M. E., & Clark, J. (1986). Speech identification under simulated hearing-aid frequency response characteristics in relation to sensitivity, frequency resolution, and temporal resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 1030–1040.
Lutman, M. E., Gatehouse, S., & Worthington, A. G. (1991). Frequency resolution as a function of hearing threshold level and age. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 320–328.
Marshall, L. (1981). Auditory processing in aging listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 226–240.
McCroskey, R. L., & Kasten, R. N. (1982). Temporal factors and the aging auditory system. Ear and Hearing, 3, 124–127.
Middelweerd, M. J., Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1990). Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram. Audiology, 29, 1–7.
Miller, G.A., & Llckllder, J.C.R. (1950). The intelligibility of interrupted speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 167–173.
Nabelek, A. K., & Robinson, P. K. (1982). Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 1242–1248.
Nelson, P. B., & Norton, S. J. (1991). Relationship between psychoacoustics and “say-sfay” identification in hearing-impaired listeners. Paper presented at the 122nd Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Houston, TX.
Pedersen, C. B., & Elberling, C. (1973). Temporal integration of acoustic energy in patients with presbycusis. Acta Oto-laryngolog-ica, 75, 32–37.
Pestalozza, G., & Shore, I. (1955). Clinical evaluation of presbycusis on the basis of different tests of auditory function. Laryngoscope, 65, 1136–1163.
Pickett, J. M., Bergman, M., & Levitt, H. (1979). Aging and speech understanding. In J. M. Ordy & K. R. Brizzee (Eds.), Sensory systems and communication in the elderly (pp. 167–186). New York: Raven.
Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979). Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1333–1342.
Price, P. J., & Simon, H. J. (1984). Perception of temporal differences in speech by “normal-hearing” adults: Effects of age and intensity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 405–410.
Prosser, S., Turrlni, M., & Arslan, E. (1991). Effects of different noises on speech discrimination by the elderly. Acta Oto-laryngologica, Supplement 476, 136–142.
Rodenburg, M. (1972). Sensitivity of the auditory system to differences in intensity. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Medical Faculty of Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
Rosen, S., Walllker, J., Brimacombe, J. A., & Edgerton, B. J.(1989). Prosodic and segmental aspects of speech perception with the House/3M single-channel implant. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 93–111.
Schum, D. J., & Matthews, L. J. (1990). SPIN test performance of elderly, hearing-impaired listeners. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg, FL.
Schum, D. J., Matthews, L. J., & Lee, F.-S. (1991). Actual and predicted word-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 636–642.
Smith, R., & Prather, W. (1971). Phoneme discrimination in older persons under varying signal-to-noise conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 630–638.
Sticht, T. G., & Gray, B. B. (1969). The intelligibility of time compressed words as a function of age and hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 443–448.
Townsend, T. H., & Bess, F. H. (1980). Effects of age and sensorineural hearing loss on word recognition. Scandinavian Audiology, 9, 245–248.
van Rooij, J. C. G. M., & Plomp, R. (1990). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 2611–2624.
van Rooij, J. C. G. M., & Plomp, R. (1992). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 1028–1033.
van Rooij, J. C. G. M., Plomp, R., & Orlebeke, J. F. (1989). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. I: Development of test battery. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1294–1309.
Van Tasell, D. J., Soli, S. D., Kirby, V. M., & Wldin, G. P. (1987). Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1152–1161.
Viemeister, N. F. (1979). Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1364–1380.
Willott, J. F. (1991). Aging and the auditory system. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
Yost, W. A., Sheft, S. S., & Ople, J. (1989). Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 2138–2147.
Zwicker, E., & Schorn, K. (1982). Temporal resolution in hard-of-hearing patients. Audiology, 21, 474–492.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
History
- Received: Nov 27, 1991
- Accepted: May 8, 1992
- Published in issue: Dec 1, 1992
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Metrics
View all metricsCitations
Download article citation data for:
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Citing Literature
- Yingyang Wang, Min Xu, Jing Shao, Jiaqiang Zhu, Yike Yang, Nan Yan, Lan Wang, Yongjie Zhou, Vocal emotion perception in Mandarin-speaking older adults with hearing loss, Speech Communication, 10.1016/j.specom.2025.103204, 169, (103204), (2025).
- Gabriel G. Sobczak, Xin Zhou, Liberty E. Moore, Daniel M. Bolt, Ruth Y. Litovsky, Cortical mechanisms of across-ear speech integration investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0307158, 19, 9, (e0307158), (2024).
- Jonathan Regev, Helia Relaño-Iborra, Johannes Zaar, Torsten Dau, Disentangling the effects of hearing loss and age on amplitude modulation frequency selectivity, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10.1121/10.0025541, 155, 4, (2589-2602), (2024).
- Kazuo Ueda, Masashi Hashimoto, Hiroshige Takeichi, Kohei Wakamiya, Interrupted mosaic speech revisited: Gain and loss in intelligibility by stretching, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10.1121/10.0025132, 155, 3, (1767-1779), (2024).
- Daniel Fogerty, Jayne B. Ahlstrom, Judy R. Dubno, Sentence recognition with modulation-filtered speech segments for younger and older adults: Effects of hearing impairment and cognition, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10.1121/10.0022445, 154, 5, (3328-3343), (2023).
- Sarah E. Yoho, Tyson S. Barrett, Stephanie A. Borrie, The Influence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on the Relationship Between the Perception of Speech in Noise and Dysarthric Speech, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00115, 66, 10, (4025-4036), (2023).
- Dylan V. Pearson, Yi Shen, J． Devin McAuley, Gary R. Kidd, The effect of rhythm on selective listening in multiple-source environments for young and older adults, Hearing Research, 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108789, 435, (108789), (2023).
- Jaehoon Jung, Byoung-Duk Lim, Hyoji Shin, Jae Hee Lee, Benefits from Spatial Separation and Fluctuating Masker on Sentence-in-Noise Recognition in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners, Audiology and Speech Research, 10.21848/asr.220098, 19, 2, (104-115), (2023).
- Jonathan Regev, Johannes Zaar, Helia Relaño-Iborra, Torsten Dau, Age-related reduction of amplitude modulation frequency selectivity, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10.1121/10.0017835, 153, 4, (2298), (2023).
- Jesyin Lai, Claude Alain, Gavin M. Bidelman, Cortical-brainstem interplay during speech perception in older adults with and without hearing loss, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10.3389/fnins.2023.1075368, 17, (2023).
View Options
Sign In Options
ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.
Member Login