Grammatical Morpheme Acquisition in 4-Year-Olds With Normal, Impaired, and Late-Developing Language

    • Rhea Paul
    • ,
    • Sally Alforde
    • , Portland State University Speech and Hearing Sciences Program Portland, ORPortland Public Schools Portland, OR

    The production of the grammatical morphemes studied by Brown and his colleagues was examined in free speech samples from a cohort of 4-year-olds with a history of slow expressive language development (SELD) and a control group of normal speakers. Results suggest that children with SELD acquire morphemes in an order very similar to that shown in previous acquisition research. Children who were slow to begin talking at age 2 and who continued to evidence delayed expressive language development by age 4 showed mastery of the four earliest acquired grammatical morphemes, as would be expected, based on their MLUs, which fell at Early Stage IV. Four-year-olds with normal language histories produced all but one of the grammatical morphemes with more than 90% accuracy, as would be expected based on their late Stage V MLUs. Children who were slow to acquire expressive language as toddlers, but who "caught up" in terms of sentence length by age 4 did not differ in MLU from their peers with normal language histories. However, they had acquired fewer of the grammatical morphemes. The implications of these findings for understanding the phenomenon of slow expressive language development are discussed.


    • American National Standards Institute. (1969). Specifications for audiometers (S3.6-1969). New York: ANSI.
    • ASHA. (1985). Guidelines for identification audiometry.Asha, 27, 49–52.
    • Bayley, R. (1969). Scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation.
    • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Cazden, C. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections.Child Development, 39, 433–448.
    • Cole, K., & Dale, P. (1991). What’s normal? Specific language impairment in an individual differences perspective.Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 80–83.
    • Dale, P., Bates, E., Reznick, S., & Morlsset, C. (1989). The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at 20 months.Journal of Child Language, 16, 239–250.
    • deVilliers, J. G., & deVilliers, P. A. (1973). A cross sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 267–278.
    • Fischel, J., Whltehurst, G., Caulfleld, M., & DeBaryshe, B. (1989). Language growth in children with expressive language delay.Pediatrics, 82, 218–227.
    • Ingram, D. (1972). The acquisition of the English verbal auxiliary and copula in normal and linguistically deviant children.Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 4, 79–92.
    • Johnston, J., & Schery, T. (1976). The use of grammatical morphemes by children with communicative disorders.In D. Morehead & A. Morehead (Eds.), Normal and deficient child language (pp. 239–258). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
    • Kahn, U., & James, S. (1983). Grammatical morpheme development in three language disordered children.Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 6, 85–100.
    • Lahey, M., Uebergott, J., Chesnlck, M., Menyuk, P., & Adams, J. (1992). Variability in children’s use of grammatical morphemes.Applied Psychollnguistics, 13, 373–398.
    • Lee, L. (1974). Developmental sentence analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    • Leonard, L. B. (1989). Language learnability and specific language impairment in children.Applied Psychollnguistics, 10, 179–202.
    • Leonard, L., Bortollnl, U., Caselll, M., McGregor, K., & Sabbadlnl, L. (1992). Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: The status of features in the underlying grammar.Language Acquisition, 2, 151–180.
    • McReynolds, L., & Kearns, K. (1983). Single subject experimental designs in communication disorders. Austinx: TX: PRO-ED.
    • Miller, J. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
    • Miller, J., & Chapman, R. (1988). Systematic analysis of language transcripts: User’s manual. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
    • Myers, J., & Bean, L. (1968). A decade later: A follow-up of social class and mental illness. New York: Wiley.
    • Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (Serial No. 143).
    • Paul, R. (1991). Profiles of toddlers with slow expressive language development.Topics in Language Disorders, 11, 1–14.
    • Paul, R., & Riback, M. (May, 1993). Sentence structure development in late talkers. Paper presented at the Symposium for Research in Child Language Disorders. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
    • Rescorla, L. (1989). The language development survey: A screening tool for delayed language in toddlers.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 587–597.
    • Reznlck, S., & Goldsmith, L. (1989). A multiple form word production checklist for assessing early language.Journal of Child Language, 76, 91–100.
    • Steckol, K. F., & Leonard, L. B. (1979). The use of grammatical morphemes by normal and language-impaired children.Journal of Communication Disorders, 12, 291–301.
    • Trantham, C., & Pederson, J. (1976). Normal language development. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Additional Resources