No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Note1 Dec 1993

Grammatical Morpheme Acquisition in 4-Year-Olds With Normal, Impaired, and Late-Developing Language

Rhea Paul
Sally Alforde

Contact author: Rhea Paul, Speech and Hearing Program, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751. E-mail: HURP@PSUORVM (Bitnet)

Portland State University Speech and Hearing Sciences Program Portland, OR

Google Scholar

More articles by this author

Portland State University Speech and Hearing Sciences Program Portland, ORPortland Public Schools Portland, OR

https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3606.1271

The production of the grammatical morphemes studied by Brown and his colleagues was examined in free speech samples from a cohort of 4-year-olds with a history of slow expressive language development (SELD) and a control group of normal speakers. Results suggest that children with SELD acquire morphemes in an order very similar to that shown in previous acquisition research. Children who were slow to begin talking at age 2 and who continued to evidence delayed expressive language development by age 4 showed mastery of the four earliest acquired grammatical morphemes, as would be expected, based on their MLUs, which fell at Early Stage IV. Four-year-olds with normal language histories produced all but one of the grammatical morphemes with more than 90% accuracy, as would be expected based on their late Stage V MLUs. Children who were slow to acquire expressive language as toddlers, but who "caught up" in terms of sentence length by age 4 did not differ in MLU from their peers with normal language histories. However, they had acquired fewer of the grammatical morphemes. The implications of these findings for understanding the phenomenon of slow expressive language development are discussed.

References

American National Standards Institute. (1969). Specifications for audiometers (S3.6-1969). New York: ANSI.
Google Scholar
ASHA. (1985). Guidelines for identification audiometry.Asha, 27, 49–52.
Google Scholar
Bayley, R. (1969). Scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crossref Google Scholar
Cazden, C. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections.Child Development, 39, 433–448.
Google Scholar
Cole, K., & Dale, P. (1991). What’s normal? Specific language impairment in an individual differences perspective.Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 80–83.
Google Scholar
Dale, P., Bates, E., Reznick, S., & Morlsset, C. (1989). The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at 20 months.Journal of Child Language, 16, 239–250.
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
deVilliers, J. G., & deVilliers, P. A. (1973). A cross sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 267–278.
Google Scholar
Fischel, J., Whltehurst, G., Caulfleld, M., & DeBaryshe, B. (1989). Language growth in children with expressive language delay.Pediatrics, 82, 218–227.
Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1972). The acquisition of the English verbal auxiliary and copula in normal and linguistically deviant children.Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 4, 79–92.
Google Scholar
Johnston, J., & Schery, T. (1976). The use of grammatical morphemes by children with communicative disorders.In D. Morehead & A. Morehead (Eds.), Normal and deficient child language (pp. 239–258). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Google Scholar
Kahn, U., & James, S. (1983). Grammatical morpheme development in three language disordered children.Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 6, 85–100.
Google Scholar
Lahey, M., Uebergott, J., Chesnlck, M., Menyuk, P., & Adams, J. (1992). Variability in children’s use of grammatical morphemes.Applied Psychollnguistics, 13, 373–398.
Google Scholar
Lee, L. (1974). Developmental sentence analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (1989). Language learnability and specific language impairment in children.Applied Psychollnguistics, 10, 179–202.
Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Bortollnl, U., Caselll, M., McGregor, K., & Sabbadlnl, L. (1992). Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: The status of features in the underlying grammar.Language Acquisition, 2, 151–180.
Crossref Google Scholar
McReynolds, L., & Kearns, K. (1983). Single subject experimental designs in communication disorders. Austinx: TX: PRO-ED.
Google Scholar
Miller, J. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Google Scholar
Miller, J., & Chapman, R. (1988). Systematic analysis of language transcripts: User’s manual. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Google Scholar
Myers, J., & Bean, L. (1968). A decade later: A follow-up of social class and mental illness. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (Serial No. 143).
Google Scholar
Paul, R. (1991). Profiles of toddlers with slow expressive language development.Topics in Language Disorders, 11, 1–14.
Crossref Google Scholar
Paul, R., & Riback, M. (May, 1993). Sentence structure development in late talkers. Paper presented at the Symposium for Research in Child Language Disorders. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. (1989). The language development survey: A screening tool for delayed language in toddlers.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 587–597.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Reznlck, S., & Goldsmith, L. (1989). A multiple form word production checklist for assessing early language.Journal of Child Language, 76, 91–100.
Google Scholar
Steckol, K. F., & Leonard, L. B. (1979). The use of grammatical morphemes by normal and language-impaired children.Journal of Communication Disorders, 12, 291–301.
Google Scholar
Trantham, C., & Pederson, J. (1976). Normal language development. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Google Scholar