ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Aug 1998

Vowel-Related Differences in Laryngeal Articulatory and Phonatory Function

    https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4104.712

    The purpose of this investigation was to study the interaction between the supralaryngeal and laryngeal components of the speech mechanism by examining vowel-related effects for a variety of vocal fold articulatory and phonatory measures. Secondary issues were to determine if vowel-related differences were influenced by the nature of the speaking task or gender. Between-vowel differences in estimated subglottal air pressure, peak oral air flow, mean phonatory air flow, air flow near the termination of the vowel, electroglottograph cycle width (EGGW), fundamental frequency, and voice onset time were examined for men and women during syllable repetitions and sentence productions. Significant vowel-related differences were found for all of the measures except mean phonatory air flow, and generally were not influenced by speaking task or gender. Vowel-related effects for estimated subglottal air pressure, peak oral air flow, fundamental frequency, and VOT were consistent with some earlier studies. New findings included vowel-related differences in EGGW and air flow near the termination of the vowel. We propose a model that includes the contribution of mechanical forces, reflexive neural activity, and learned neural activity to explain vowel-related effects. When vowel height is varied, changes in laryngeal cartilage positioning and vocal fold and vocal tract tension appear to influence laryngeal articulatory and phonatory function.

    References

    • Bickley, C. A., & Stevens, K. N. (1986). Effects of a vocal-tract constriction on the glottal source: Experimental and modelling studies.Journal of Phonetics, 14, 373–382.
      Google Scholar
    • Bickley, C. A., & Stevens, K. N. (1987). Effects of a vocal tract constriction on the glottal source: Data from voiced consonants.In T. Baer, C. Sasaki, & K. Harrism (Eds.), Laryngeal function in phonation and respiration (pp. 239– 253). Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, Inc.
      Google Scholar
    • Brown, W. S., McGlone, R. E., & Profitt, W. (1973). Relationships of lingual and intraoral pressures during syllable production.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 16, 141–150.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Colton, R. H., & Conture, E. G. (1990). Problems and pitfalls of electroglottography.Journal of Voice, 4, 10–24.
      Google Scholar
    • Emanuel, F., & Counihan, D. (1970). Some characteristics of oral and nasal airflow during plosive consonant production.Cleft Palate Journal, 7, 249–260.
      Google Scholar
    • Fitch, J. L. (1990). Consistency of fundamental frequency and perturbation in repeated phonations of sustained vowels, reading, and connected speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 360–363.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Gelfer, M. P. (1995). Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel selection: Effects on measures of phonatory stability.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1189–1198.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Gilbert, H. (1973). Oral airflow during stop consonant production.Folia Phoniatrica, 25, 288–260.
      Google Scholar
    • Glaze, L., Bless, D., & Susser, R. (1990). Acoustic analysis of vowel and loudness differences in children’s voices.Journal of Voice, 4, 37–44.
      Google Scholar
    • Higgins, M. B., Carney, A. E., & Schulte, L. (1994). Physiologic assessment of speech and voice production of adults with hearing loss.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 510–521.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Higgins, M. B., Netsell, R., & Schulte, L. (1994). Aerodynamic and electroglottographic measures of normal voice production: Intrasubject variability within and across sessions.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 38–45.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Higgins, M. B., & Saxman, J. H. (1989). A comparison of intrasubject variation across sessions of three vocal frequency perturbation indices.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 911–916.
      Google Scholar
    • Higgins, M. B., & Saxman, J. H. (1991). A comparison of selected phonatory behaviors of healthy aged and young adults.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1001–1010.
      Google Scholar
    • Higgins, M. B., & Saxman, J. H. (1993). Inverse-filtered air flow and EGG measures for sustained vowels and syllables.Journal of Voice, 7, 47–53.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Hoit, J. D., Solomon, N. P., & Hixon, T. J. (1993). Effect of lung volume on voice onset time (VOT).Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 516–520.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Holmberg, E. B., Hillman, R. E., & Perkell, J. S. (1988). Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 511–529.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Honda, K. (1983). Relationship between pitch control and vowel articulation.In D. M. Bless & J. H. Abbs (Eds.), Vocal fold physiology: Contemporary research and clinical issues (pp. 286–297). San Diego: College-Hill Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Honda, K. (1995). Laryngeal and extra-laryngeal mechanisms of Fo control.In F. Bell-Berti & L. J. Raphael (Eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues for Katherine Safford Harris (pp. 215–232). New York: American Institute of Physics.
      Google Scholar
    • Horii, Y. (1980). Vocal shimmer in sustained phonation.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 5–19.
      Google Scholar
    • Horii, Y. (1982). Jitter and shimmer differences among sustained vowel productions.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 202–209.
      Google Scholar
    • Isshiki, N., & Ringel, R. (1964). Air flow during production of selected consonants.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 7, 233–244.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Karnell, M. P., & Willis, C. R. (1982). The effect of vowel context on consonantal intraoral air pressure.Folia Phoniatrica, 34, 1–8.
      Google Scholar
    • Klatt, D. H. (1975). Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 129–140.
      Google Scholar
    • Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Klich, R. J. (1982). Effects of speech level and vowel context on intraoral air pressure in vocal and whispered speech.Folia Phoniatrica, 34, 33–40.
      Google Scholar
    • Lane, H., Wozniak, J., & Perkell, J. (1994). Changes in voice-onset time in speakers with cochlear implants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 56–64.
      Google Scholar
    • Linville, S., Korabic, E., & Rosera, M. (1990). Intra production variability in jitter measures from elderly speakers.Journal of Voice, 4, 45–51.
      Google Scholar
    • Lofqvist, A., Baer, T., McGarr, N. S., & Seider Story, R. (1989). The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1314–1321.
      Google Scholar
    • Müller, E. M., & Brown, W. S. (1980). Variations in the supralaryngeal air pressure waveform and their articula-tory interpretation.In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice (pp. 317–389). New York: Academic Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Netsell, R., Lotz, W.K., DuChane, A. S., & Barlow, S. M. (1991). Vocal tract aerodynamics during syllable productions: Normative data and theoretical implications.Journal of Voice, 5, 1–9.
      Google Scholar
    • Nittrouer, S., McGowan, R. S., Milenkovic, P. H., & Beehler, D. (1990). Acoustic measures of men’s and women’s voices: A study of contexts effects and covariation.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 761–775.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Orlikoff, R. F. (1991). Assessment of the dynamics of vocal fold contact from the electroglottogram: Data from normal male participants.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1066–1072.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Orlikoff, R. F. (1995). Vocal stability and vocal tract configuration: An acoustic and electroglottographic investigation.Journal of Voice, 9, 173–181.
      Google Scholar
    • Peterson, G. E., & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693–703.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Port, R. F., & Rotunno, R. (1979). Relation between voice-onset time and vowel duration.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 654–682.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Ramig, L. A. (1983). Effects of physiological aging on speaking and reading rates.Journal of Communication Disorders, 16, 217–226.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Rothenberg, M. (1982). Interpolating subglottal pressure from oral pressures.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 219–220.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Rothenberg, M., & Mahshie, J. (1988). Monitoring vocal fold abduction through vocal fold contact area.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 338–351.
      Google Scholar
    • Sapir, S. (1989). The intrinsic pitch of vowels: Theoretical, physiological, and clinical considerations.Journal of Voice, 3, 44–51.
      Google Scholar
    • Scherer, R. C., Vail, V. J., & Rockwell, B. (1995). Examination of the laryngeal adduction measure EGGW.In F. Bell-Berti & L. J. Raphael (Eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues for Katherine Safford Harris (pp. 269–289). New York: American Institute of Physics.
      Google Scholar
    • Smitheran, J., & Hixon, T. J. (1981). A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 138–146.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Stathopoulos, E. T., & Weismer, G. (1985). Oral air flow and air pressure during speech production: A comparative study of children, youths, and adults.Folia Phoniatrica, 37, 152–159.
      Google Scholar
    • Svirsky, M. A., Lane, H., Perkell, J. S., & Wozniak, J. (1992). Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 1284– 1300.
      Google Scholar
    • Till, J. A., Jafari, M., Crumley, R. L., & Law-Till, C. B. (1992). Effects of initial consonant, pneumotachographic mask, and oral pressure tube on vocal perturbation, harmonics-to-noise, and intensity measurements.Journal of Voice, 6, 217–223.
      Google Scholar
    • Titze, I. R. (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1699–1707.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Trullinger, R. W., & Emanuel, F. W. (1983). Airflow characteristics of stop-plosive consonant productions of normal-speaking children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 202–208.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Vilkman, E., Sonninen, A., Hurme, P., & Körkkö, P. (1996). External laryngeal frame function in voice production revisited: A review.Journal of Voice, 10, 78–92.
      Google Scholar
    • Weismer, G. (1979). Sensitivity of VOT measures to certain segmental features in speech production.Journal of Phonetics, 7, 196–204.
      Google Scholar
    • Weismer, G., & Longstreth, D. (1980). Segmental gestures at the laryngeal level in whispered speech: Evidence from an aerodynamic study.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 383–392.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar

    Additional Resources