Multicultural Neurogenics: A Call and Response to Embrace Global Issues in Neurogenics

    This epilogue outlines the call to address the clinical needs of adults from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds with neurogenic communication disorders, and the training needs of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who provide those services. A response to those needs is provided in terms of advances that have been made over time, and limited areas that require future attention. Brief summaries are provided for articles in this issue, with reference to how each article contributes to advances in service delivery to culturally and linguistically diverse adults with neurogenic communication disorders around the world.


    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1982). Urban and Ethnic Perspectives Newsletter, 9–10.
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (Committee on the Status of Racial Minorities). (1985). Clinical management of communicatively handicapped minority language populations: position statement.American Speech-Language Hearing Association Magazine. ( 27 (6), 29–32.
    • Centeno, J. (2015). Assessing services with communicatively impaired bilingual adults in culturally and linguistically diverse neurorehabilitation programs.Journal of Communication Disorders, 58, 58–73.
    • Centeno, J. (2017). Aphasia services in diverse neurorehabilitation caseloads: An interdisciplinary group newsletter, 1–7.
    • Code, C. (2001). Multifactorial processes in recovery from aphasia: Developing the foundations for a multileveled framework.Brain and Language, 77, 25–44.
    • Hersh, D., Armstrong, E., Panak, V., & Coombes, J. (2014, advance online). Speech-language pathology practices with indigenous Australians with acquired communication disorders.International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1–12.
    • Moore, M. (2009). (1968). Orlando Taylor looks back.ASHA Leader, 14, 20–21.
    • Rose, M., Ferguson, A., Power, E., Togher, L., & Worrall, L. (2014). Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: Current practices, challenges and future directions.International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(2), 169–180.
    • Siyambalapitiya, S., & Davidson, B. (2015). Managing aphasia in bilingual and culturally and linguistically diverse Individuals in an Australian context: Challenges and future directions.Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech Language Pathology, 17(1), 13–19.
    • Stockman, I., Boult, J., & Robinson, G. C. (2008). Multicultural/multilingual instruction in educational programs: A survey of perceived faculty practices and outcomes.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 241–264.
    • Wallace, G. (1996). Management of aphasic individuals from culturally and linguistically diverse populations.In G. Wallace (Ed.). Adult aphasia rehabilitation (pp.103–119). Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.
    • Wallace, G. (1997). Multicultural neurogenics: A clinical resource for speech-language pathologists providing services to neurologically-impaired adults from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. San Antonio, Texas: Communication Skill Builders.
    • Wallace, G. (2010). Profile of life participation after stroke and aphasia.Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17(6), 432–450.
    • Wallace, G. (2017). Cultural competence in adult neurorehabilitation: A community-based rehabilitation approach for speech-language pathologists. Manuscript in preparation.
    • Wallace, G., & Bridges Freeman, S. (1991). Adults with neurological impairment from multicultural populations: Results of a clinical survey.American Speech Language Hearing Association Magazine, 33, 6–7, 58–60.
    • World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
    • Wright-Harp, W., & Payne, J. (2016). Ethnocultural considerations in treatment of diverse populations.ECHO: Journal of the National Black Association for Speech-Language and Hearing, 11(2), 85–99.

    Additional Resources