Speaking Clearly for Older Adults With Normal Hearing: The Role of Speaking Rate
Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 62, Number 10
Pages 3851-3859
Abstract
Purpose
Talkers typically use a slow speaking rate when producing clear speech, a speaking style that has been widely shown to improve intelligibility over conversational speech in difficult communication environments. With training, however, talkers can learn to produce a form of clear speech at normal speaking rates that provides young listeners with normal hearing much of the same intelligibility benefit. The purpose of this study was to determine if older listeners with normal hearing can also obtain an intelligibility benefit from clear speech at normal rates.
Method
Eight older listeners (55–68 years of age) with normal hearing were presented with nonsense sentences from 4 talkers in a background of speech-shaped noise (signal-to-noise ratio = 0 dB). Intelligibility (percent correct key words) was evaluated for conversational and clear speech produced at 2 speaking rates (normal and slow), for a total of 4 conditions: conv/normal, conv/slow, clear/normal, and clear/slow.
Results
As expected, the clear/slow speaking condition provided a large and robust intelligibility advantage (23 points) over conv/normal speech. The conv/slow condition provided almost as much benefit on average (21 points) but was highly variable across talkers. Notably, the clear/normal speaking condition provided the same size intelligibility advantage (14 points), previously reported for young listeners with normal hearing (Krause & Braida, 2002), thus extending the benefit of clear speech at normal speaking rates to older normal-hearing listeners.
Conclusions
Applications based on clear/normal speech (e.g., signal processing approaches for hearing aids) have the potential to provide comparable intelligibility improvements to older and younger listeners alike.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adams, E. M., Gordon-Hickey, S., Morlas, H., & Moore, R. (2012). Effect of rate-alteration on speech perception in noise in older adults with normal hearing and hearing impairment. American Journal of Audiology, 21, 22–32.
American National Standards Institute. (2010). Specification for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-2010). New York, NY: Author.
Behrman, A. (2017). A clear speech approach to accent management. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(4), 1178–1192.
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2002). The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 272–284.
Bradlow, A. R., Kraus, N., & Hayes, E. (2003). Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: Sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 80–97.
Caissie, R., Campbell, M. M., Frenette, W. L., Howell, I., & Roy, A. (2005). Clear speech for adults with a hearing loss: Does intervention with communication partners make a difference. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16, 157–171.
Dubno, J. R., Dirks, D. D., & Morgan, D. E. (1984). Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 6, 87–96.
Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 259–271.
Ferguson, S. H., & Morgan, S. D. (2018). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Perceived sentence clarity for young adults with normal hearing and older adults with hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(1), 159–173.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
Frisina, D. R., & Frisina, R. D. (1997). Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hearing Research, 106, 95–104.
Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1995). Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1150–1156.
Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1997). Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(2), 423–431.
Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1999). Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 300–311.
Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2004). Effects of stimulus and noise rate variability on speech perception by younger and older adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(4), 1808–1817.
Gordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Barrett, J. (2006). Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 2455–2466.
Gordon-Salant, S., Zion, D. J., & Espy-Wilson, C. (2014). Recognition of time-compressed speech does not predict recognition of natural fast-rate speech by older listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(4), EL268–EL274.
Grose, J. H., Mamo, S. K., & Hall, J. W., III. (2009). Age effects in temporal envelope processing: Speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses. Ear and Hearing, 30(5), 568–575.
Helfer, K. S. (1998). Auditory and auditory-visual recognition of clear and conversational speech by older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 9, 234–242.
Humes, L. E., Burk, M. H., Coughlin, M. P., Busey, T. A., & Strauser, L. E. (2007). Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: Similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 283–303.
Kidd, G. R., & Humes, L. E. (2012). Effects of age and hearing loss on the recognition of interrupted words in isolation and in sentences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(2), 1434–1448.
Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (2002). Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: The effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2165–2172.
Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (2003). Effects of listening environment on intelligibility of clear speech at normal speaking rate. Iranian Audiology, 2, 39–47.
Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (2004). Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(1), 362–378.
Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (2009). Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), 3346–3357.
Kricos, P. B. (2006). Audiologic management of older adults with hearing loss and compromised cognitive/psychoacoustic auditory processing capabilities. Trends in Amplification, 10(1), 1–28.
Lister, J., & Tarver, K. (2004). Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(2), 257–268.
Liu, S., Del Rio, E., Bradlow, A. R., & Zeng, F.-G. (2004). Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2374–2383.
Liu, S., & Zeng, F.-G. (2006). Temporal properties in clear speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 424–432.
Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., & Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085–1099.
Oticon. (2011). Communication is a two way street. Retrieved from https://www.oticon.com/-/media/oticon-us/main/download-center/patient-education/17306-patient-education---communication-is-a-two-way-street.pdf
Park, S., Theodoros, D., Finch, E., & Cardell, E. (2016). Be clear: A new intensive speech treatment for adults with nonprogressive dysarthria. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(1), 97–110.
Payton, K. L., Uchanski, R. M., & Braida, L. D. (1994). Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1581–1592.
Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1985). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28(1), 96–103.
Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29(4), 434–446.
Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1989). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32(3), 600–603.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428.
Schneider, B. A., & Hamstra, S. J. (1999). Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(1), 371–380.
Strouse, A., Ashmead, D. H., Ohde, R. N., & Grantham, D. W. (1998). Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(4), 2385–2399.
Tremblay, K. L., Piskosz, M., & Souza, P. (2003). Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(7), 1332–1343.
Tun, P. A. (1998). Fast noisy speech: Age differences in processing rapid speech with background noise. Psychology and Aging, 13(3), 424–434.
Uchanski, R. M. (2005). Clear speech. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), Handbook of speech perception (pp. 207–235). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Uchanski, R. M., Choi, S. S., Braida, L. D., Reed, C. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1996). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(3), 494–509.
Van Engen, K. J. (2017). Clear speech and lexical competition in younger and older adult listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), 1067–1077.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 62 • Number 10 • October 2019
Pages: 3851-3859
PubMed: 31580758
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
History
- Received: Feb 28, 2019
- Revised: Jun 20, 2019
- Accepted: Jul 5, 2019
- Published online: Oct 3, 2019
- Published in issue: Oct 25, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Metrics
View all metricsCitations
Download article citation data for:
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Citing Literature
- Bok Baik, Alex G. Kim, David S. Kim, Sangwon Yoon, Vocal delivery quality in earnings conference calls, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2024.101763, (101763), (2024).
- Triston Cooper, Heather Lai, Jenna Gorlewicz, Do You Hear What I Hear: The Balancing Act of Designing an Electronic Hockey Puck for Playing Hockey Non-Visually, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 10.1145/3507660, 15, 1, (1-29), (2022).
- Kelly Miles, Timothy Beechey, Virginia Best, Jörg Buchholz, Measuring Speech Intelligibility and Hearing-Aid Benefit Using Everyday Conversational Sentences in Real-World Environments, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10.3389/fnins.2022.789565, 16, (2022).
- Brandi Jett, Emily Buss, Virginia Best, Jacob Oleson, Lauren Calandruccio, Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00450, 64, 4, (1390-1403), (2021).
View Options
Sign In Options
ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.
Member Login