No access
Review Article
9 August 2021

The Impact of Intervention Dose Form on Oral Language Outcomes for Children With Developmental Language Disorder

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 64, Number 8
Pages 3253-3288

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to extract key learning from intervention studies in which qualitative aspects of dosage, dose form, have been examined for children with developmental language disorder (DLD)—in vocabulary, morphosyntax, and phonology domains. This research paper emerged from a pair of systematic reviews, aiming to synthesize available evidence regarding qualitative and quantitative aspects of dosage. While quantitative aspects had been experimentally manipulated, the available evidence for dose form (tasks or activities within which teaching episodes are delivered) was less definitive. Despite this, the review uncovered insights of value to DLD research.

Method

A preregistered systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017076663) adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was completed. Included papers were quasi-experimental, randomized controlled trial, or cohort analytic studies, published in any language between January 2006 and May 2019; oral language interventions with vocabulary, morphosyntax, or phonology outcomes; and participants with DLD (M = 3–18 years). The intention was to include papers in which dose form was experimentally manipulated or statistically analyzed, while quantitative dosage aspects were controlled, such that definitive conclusions about optimal dose form could be drawn and gaps in the evidence identified.

Results

Two hundred and twenty-four papers met the above inclusion criteria; 27 focused on dose form. No study controlled for all quantitative aspects of dosage such that we could effectively address our original research questions. Despite this, key points of learning emerged with implications for future research.

Conclusions

There is tentative evidence of advantages for explicit over implicit instruction and of the benefits of variability in input, elicited production, and gestural and other visual supports. With careful design of dose form, there is potential to design more efficient interventions. Speech-language pathology research would benefit from an agreed taxonomy of dose form components and standardized reporting of intervention studies, to enable cross-study comparisons and a systematic accrual of knowledge to identify optimal dose form for clinical application.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material S1. (jslhr-20-00734frizelle_supps1.jpg)
Critical appraisal of each included study.

References

Aguilar, J. M., Plante, E., & Sandoval, M. (2018). Exemplar variability facilitates retention of word learning by children with specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(1), 72–84.
Alt, M., Meyers, C., Oglivie, T., Nicholas, K., & Arizmendi, G. (2014). Cross-situational statistically based word learning intervention for late-talking toddlers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 52, 207–220.
Alt, M., & Plante, E. (2006). Factors that influence lexical and semantic fast mapping of young children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(5), 941–954.
American Psychological Association. (2010). What is APA Style JARS? Retrieved December 18, 2020, from https://apastyle.apa.org/jars#:~:text=APA%20Style%20Journal%20Article%20Reporting%20Standards%20
Baker, E., & McLeod, S. (2004). Evidence-based management of phonological impairment in children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20(3), 261–285.
Baker, E., Williams, A. L., McLeod, S., & McCauley, R. (2018). Elements of phonological interventions for children with speech sound disorders: The development of a taxonomy. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 906–935.
Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., Greenhalgh, T., & CATALISE Consortium. (2016). CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children. PLOS ONE, 11(7), e0158753.
Camarata, S. M., Nelson, K. E., & Camarata, M. N. (1994). Comparison of conversational-recasting and imitative procedures for training grammatical structures in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37(6), 1414–1423.
Cirrin, F. M., & Gillam, R. B. (2008). Language intervention practices for school-age children with spoken language disorders: A systematic review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39(1), S110–S137.
Cirrin, F. M., Schooling, T. L., Nelson, N. W., Diehl, S. F., Flynn, P. F., Staskowski, M., Torrey, T. Z., & Adamczyk, D. F. (2010). Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of different service delivery models on communication outcomes for elementary school–age children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(3), 233–264.
Connell, P. J., & Stone, C. A. (1992). Morpheme learning of children with specific language impairment under controlled instructional conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(4), 844–852.
Courtright, J. A., & Courtright, I. C. (1979). Imitative modeling as a language intervention strategy: The effects of two mediating variables. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22(2), 389–402.
Eadie, P., Morgan, A., Ukoumunne, O., Ttofari Eecen, K., Wake, M., & Reilly, S. (2014). Speech sound disorder at 4 years: Prevalence, comorbidities, and predictors in a community cohort of children. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 57(6), 578–584.
Ebbels, S. (2014). Effectiveness of intervention for grammar in school-aged children with primary language impairments: A review of the evidence. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(1), 7–40.
Eidsvåg, S. S., Plante, E., Oglivie, T., Privette, C., & Mailend, M.-L. (2019). Individual versus small group treatment of morphological errors for children with developmental language disorder. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(2), 237–252.
Eisenberg, S. (2014). What works in therapy: Further thoughts on improving clinical practice for children with language disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(2), 117–126.
Eisenberg, S. L., Bredin-Oja, S. L., & Crumrine, K. (2020). Use of imitation training for targeting grammar: A narrative review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 205–225.
Fey, M. E. (1986). Language intervention with young children. College Hill Press.
Fey, M. E., Leonard, L. B., Bredin-Oja, S. L., & Deevy, P. (2017). A clinical evaluation of the competing sources of input hypothesis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1), 104–120.
Finestack, L. H. (2018). Evaluation of an explicit intervention to teach novel grammatical forms to children with developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(8), 2062–2075.
Finestack, L. H., & Fey, M. H. (2009). Evaluation of a deductive procedure to teach grammatical inflections to children with language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(3), 289–302.
Frizelle, P., Tolonen, A.-K., Tulip, J., Murphy, C.-A., Saldana, D., & McKean, C. (2021). The influence of quantitative intervention dosage on oral language outcomes for children with developmental language disorder: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(2), 738–754.
Gillon, G. (2000). The efficacy of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(2), 126–141.
Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431–436.
Gray, S., Pittman, A., & Weinhold, J. (2014). Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 1011–1025.
Haebig, E., Leonard, L. B., Deevy, P., Karpicke, J., Christ, S. L., Usler, E., Kueser, J. B., Souto, S., Krok, W., & Weber, C. (2019). Retrieval-based word learning in young typically developing children and children with development language disorder II: A comparison of retrieval schedules. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(4), 944–964.
Hassink, J. M., & Leonard, L. B. (2010). Within-treatment factors as predictors of outcomes following conversational recasting. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(3), 213–224.
Heikkilä, J., Lonka, E., Meronen, A., Tuovinen, S., Eronen, R., Leppänen, P. H., Richardson, U., Ahonen, T., & Tiippana, K. (2018). The effect of audiovisual speech training on the phonological skills of children with specific language impairment (SLI). Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 34(3), 269–287.
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343, d5928–d5928.
Hodson, B. W. (2015). Cycles phonological patterns approach. In C. Bowen (Ed.), Children's speech sound disorders (2nd ed., pp. 36–40). Wiley-Blackwell.
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., Lamb, S. E., Dixon-Woods, M., McCulloch, P., Wyatt, J. C., Chan, A.-W., & Michie, S. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348, g1687–g1687.
Kamhi, A. (2014). Improving clinical practices for children with language and learning disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(2), 92–103.
Korat, O., Graister, T., & Altman, C. (2019). Contribution of reading an e-book with a dictionary to word learning: Comparison between kindergarteners with and without SLI. Journal of Communication Disorders, 79, 90–102.
Kouri, T. A., & Winn, J. (2006). Lexical learning in sung and spoken story script contexts. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 22(3), 293–313.
Krok, W. C., & Leonard, L. B. (2018). Verb variability and morphosyntactic priming with typically developing 2- and 3-year-olds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(12), 2996–3009.
Krzemien, M., Thibaut, J.-P., Jemel, B., Levaux, E., & Maillart, C. (2020). How do children with developmental language disorder extend novel nouns? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 202, 105010.
Law, J., Garrett, Z., & Nye, C. (2004). The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(4), 924–943.
Leonard, L. B., Camarata, S. M., Pawlowska, M., Brown, B., & Camarata, M. N. (2006). Tense and agreement morphemes in the speech of children with specific language impairment during intervention: Phase 2. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(4), 749–770.
Leonard, L. B., Deevy, P., Karpicke, J. D., Christ, S., Weber, C., Kueser, J. B., & Haebig, E. (2019). Adjective learning in young typically developing children and children with developmental language disorder: A retrieval-based approach. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(12), 4433–4449.
Leonard, L. B., Karpicke, J., Deevy, P., Weber, C., Christ, S., Haebig, E., Souto, S., Kueser, J. B., & Krok, W. (2019). Retrieval-based word learning in young typically developing children and children with developmental language disorder I: The benefits of repeated retrieval. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(4), 932–943.
Lüke, C., Rohlfing, K., & Stenneken, P. (2011). Signs and communicative communication in children with a specific language development disorder. Language Voice Hearing, 35(4), e149–e157.
Maguire, M. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Brandone, A. C. (2008). Focusing on the relation: Fewer exemplars facilitate children's initial verb learning and extension. Developmental Science, 11(4), 628–634.
Marulis, L., & Neuman, S. (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children's word learning. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 300–335.
Masterson, J. J., & Perrey, C. D. (1999). Training analogical reasoning skills in children with language disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8(1), 53–61.
McKean, C., Frizelle, P., Tolonen, A. K., Kunnari, S., Murphy, C. A., Saldana, D., Law, J., & Josie, T. (2017). Interventions for children with primary language impairment: A COST IS1406 systematic review of the influence of dosage in interventions addressing vocabulary, phonology and morphosyntax outcomes. National Institute for Health Research. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017076663
Moher, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269.
Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (2011). Oxford COVID-19 evidence service. https://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653
Pennington, B., & Bishop, D. (2009). Relations among speech, language, and reading disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 283–306.
Perry, L. K., Samuelson, L. K., Malloy, L. M., & Schiffer, R. N. (2010). Learn locally, think globally: Exemplar variability supports higher-order generalization and word learning. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1894–1902.
Plante, E., Ogilvie, T., Vance, R., Aguilar, J. M., Dailey, N. S., Meyers, C., Lieser, A. M., & Burton, R. (2014). Variability in the language input to children enhances learning in a treatment context. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(4), 530–545.
Plante, E., Tucci, A., Nicholas, K., Arizmendi, G. D., & Vance, R. (2018). Effective use of auditory bombardment as a therapy adjunct for children with developmental language disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(2), 320–333.
Proctor-Williams, K. (2009). Dosage and distribution in morphosyntax intervention. Topics in Language Disorders, 29(4), 294–311.
Proctor-Williams, K., & Fey, M. E. (2007). Recast density and acquisition of novel irregular past tense verbs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1029–1047.
Riches, N. G., Faragher, B., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2006). Verb schema use and input dependence in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(2), 117–135.
Smeets, D. J. H., van Dijken, M. J., & Bus, A. G. (2012). Using electronic storybooks to support word learning in children with severe language impairments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(5), 435–449.
Smith-Lock, K. M., Leitao, S., Lambert, L., Prior, P., Dunn, A., Cronje, S., Newhouse, S., & Nickels, L. (2015). The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI: A randomized clinical trial. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46(4), 312–324.
Steele, S. C., Willoughby, L. M., & Mills, M. T. (2013). Learning word meanings during reading: Effects of phonological and semantic cues on children with language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(2), 184–197.
Storkel, H. L., Komesidou, R., Pezold, M. J., Pitt, A. R., Fleming, K. K., & Romine, R. S. (2019). The impact of dose and dose frequency on word learning by kindergarten children with developmental language disorder during interactive book reading. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 518–539.
Storkel, H., & Lee, S.-Y. (2011). The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 191–211.
Storkel, H. L., Voelmle, K., Fierro, V., Flake, K., Fleming, K. K., & Romine, R. S. (2017). Interactive book reading to accelerate word learning by kindergarten children with specific language impairment: Identifying an adequate intensity and variation in treatment response. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(1), 16–30.
Swisher, L., Restrepo, M., Plante, E., & Lowell, S. (1995). Effect of implicit and explicit "rule" presentation on bound-morpheme generalization in specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(1), 168–173.
Twomey, K. E., Ranson, S. L., & Horst, J. S. (2013). That's more like it: Multiple exemplars facilitate word learning. Infant and Child Development, 23(2), 105–122.
van Berkel-van Hoof, L., Hermans, D., Knoors, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). Effects of signs on word learning by children with developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(6), 1798–1812.
Van Horne, A. J. O., Curran, M., Larson, C., & Fey, M. E. (2018). Effects of a complexity-based approach on generalization of past tense –ed and related morphemes. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3S), 681–693.
Van Horne, A. J. O., Fey, M., & Curran, M. (2017). Do the hard things first: A randomized controlled trial testing the effects of exemplar selection on generalization following therapy for grammatical morphology. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(9), 2569–2588.
Vogt, S. S., & Kauschke, C. (2017a). Observing iconic gestures enhances word learning in typically developing children and children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language, 44(6), 1458–1484.
Vogt, S. S., & Kauschke, C. (2017b). With some help from others' hands: Iconic gesture helps semantic learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(11), 3213–3225.
Warren, S., Fey, M., & Yoder, P. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(1), 70–77.
Wren, Y., Harding, S., Goldbart, J., & Roulstone, S. (2018). A systematic review and classification of interventions for speech-sound disorder in preschool children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(3), 446–467.
Yoder, P. J., Molfese, D., & Gardner, E. (2011). Initial mean length of utterance predicts the relative efficacy of two grammatical treatments in preschoolers with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(4), 1170–1181.
Zeng, B., Law, J., & Lindsay, G. (2012). Characterizing optimal intervention intensity: The relationship between dosage and effect size in interventions for children with developmental speech and language difficulties. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(5), 471–477.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 64Number 8August 2021
Pages: 3253-3288
PubMed: 34213951

History

  • Received: Dec 21, 2020
  • Revised: Feb 22, 2021
  • Accepted: Apr 6, 2021
  • Published online: Jul 1, 2021
  • Published in issue: Aug 9, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing - original draft, and Writing - review & editing.
Anna-Kaisa Tolonen
Research Unit of Logopedics, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu, Finland
Author Contributions: Project administration and Validation.
Josie Tulip
Department of Speech and Language Sciences, School of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
Author Contributions: Project administration and Software.
Carol-Anne Murphy
Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Ireland
Author Contributions: Software and Validation.
David Saldana
Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, University of Seville, Spain
Author Contribution: Software.
Cristina McKean
Department of Speech and Language Sciences, School of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, and Writing - review & editing.

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing interests existed at the time of publication.
Correspondence to Pauline Frizelle: [email protected]
Editor-in-Chief: Stephen M. Camarata
Editor: Megan York Roberts

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • In Vitro Assessment on the Synergistic Antibacterial Effect of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) Extract with Clindamycin Antibiotic against Staphylococcus aureus, International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10.38124/ijisrt/25mar816, (2762-2772), (2025).
  • Educational practices for the language development of students with intellectual developmental disorder in the school setting: a systematic review, Frontiers in Education, 10.3389/feduc.2024.1422139, 9, (2024).
  • The Effectiveness of Individualized Morphosyntactic Target Identification and Explicit Intervention Using the SHAPE CODING System for Children With Developmental Language Disorder and the Impact of Within-Session Dosage, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00098, 55, 3, (803-837), (2024).
  • Age of onset, motivation, and anxiety as predictors of grammar and vocabulary outcomes in English as a foreign language learners with developmental language disorder, Journal of Communication Disorders, 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106407, 108, (106407), (2024).
  • Elevating Patient Care With Deep Learning: High-Resolution Cervical Auscultation Signals for Swallowing Kinematic Analysis in Nasogastric Tube Patients, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3497895, 12, (711-720), (2024).
  • Identifying Developmental Language Disorder in Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants: A Case Study of Three Children, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10.3390/jcm12175755, 12, 17, (5755), (2023).
  • Effectiveness of a group intervention for lexical enrichment in 6-to-10-year-old children with developmental language disorder, Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 10.1177/02656590231188523, 39, 3, (218-233), (2023).
  • Systematic language input improved productions of elaborated verb phrases of Cantonese-speaking children with language difficulties, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 10.1080/02699206.2022.2157330, 37, 4-6, (473-490), (2023).
  • Teaching foreign language grammar to primary-school children with developmental language disorder: A classroom-based intervention study, Journal of Communication Disorders, 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106269, 100, (106269), (2022).
  • A Systematic Review of Interventions for Late Talkers: Intervention Approaches, Elements, and Vocabulary Outcomes, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00168, 31, 6, (2861-2874), (2022).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share