No access
Research Article
4 June 2025

The Use of Conversational Repairs in Interactions Involving People With Parkinson's Disease: A Large Corpus Comparison Study

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Newly Published
Pages 1-17

Abstract

Purpose:

Interlocutors engage in acts of conversational repair to resolve trouble sources, or communication breakdowns. This is necessary for successful communication, allowing interlocutors to establish and maintain common ground. Here, we investigated the use of conversational repairs in the conversations of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and concomitant dysarthria.

Method:

Conversational repairs were coded in a large corpus of 114 conversations involving a person with PD and a neurotypical (NT) partner (NT–PD dyads) and a comparison corpus of 80 conversations involving two NT partners (NT–NT dyads). Conversations varied across two contextual dimensions: conversational goal (informational vs. relational) and partner familiarity (familiar vs. unfamiliar).

Results:

Over the course of 10-min conversations, NT–PD and NT–NT dyads produced a similar number of conversational repairs; however, NT–PD dyads exhibited higher usage of repairs per conversational turn. In addition, dyads involving participants with PD with moderate dysarthria showed different repair patterns relative to dyads involving participants with PD with mild or mild–moderate dysarthria as well as NT–NT dyads—the key being that they used fewer self-initiated and more other-initiated repairs. Across all dyads, informational conversations had more repairs than relational conversations, and dyads involving participants with PD with moderate dysarthria relied more heavily on other-initiated repairs when conversing with a familiar partner relative to an unfamiliar partner.

Conclusions:

The use of repairs in the conversations of people with PD differs from that in NT–NT conversations. The key is that the conversations of people with PD have a greater number of repairs per conversational turn and the distribution of repairs differs when people with PD have more pronounced intelligibility impairments. Additionally, the study provides empirical support for longstanding claims regarding the use of repairs in NT–NT dyads as well as claims from case study conversations involving people with dysarthria.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Albert, S., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2018). Repair: The interface between interaction and cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(2), 279–313.
Altmann, L. J., & Troche, M. S. (2011). High‐level language production in Parkinson's disease: A review. Parkinson's Disease, 2011(1), Article 238956. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/238956
Baker, R., & Hazan, V. (2011). DiapixUK: Task materials for the elicitation of multiple spontaneous speech dialogs. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 761–770.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Baylor, C., & Darling-White, M. (2020). Achieving participation-focused intervention through shared decision making: Proposal of an age-and disorder-generic framework. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(3), 1335–1360.
Baylor, C. R., Yorkston, K. M., Eadie, T. L., Miller, R. M., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Developing the Communicative Participation Item Bank: Rasch analysis results from a spasmodic dysphonia sample. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(5), 1302–1320.
Bloch, S. (2006). Trouble sources and repair in acquired dysarthria and communication aid use: A conversation analysis study [Doctoral dissertation, University of London]. UCL Discovery. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/66888/
Bloch, S., & Barnes, S. (2020). Dysarthria and other-initiated repair in everyday conversation. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 34(10–11), 977–997.
Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(4), 272–282.
Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2009). Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Identifying sources of understandability problems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(5), 769–783.
Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2011). Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Methods of resolving understandability problems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46(5), 510–523.
Borrie, S. A., Wynn, C. J., Berisha, V., & Barrett, T. S. (2022). From speech acoustics to communicative participation in dysarthria: Toward a causal framework. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(2), 405–418.
Clark, H. H. (1994). Managing problems in speaking. Speech Communication, 15(3–4), 243–250.
Clark, J. P., Adams, S. G., Dykstra, A. D., Moodie, S., & Jog, M. (2014). Loudness perception and speech intensity control in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Communication Disorders, 51, 1–12.
Clift, R. (2016). Conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Collis, J., & Bloch, S. (2012). Survey of UK speech and language therapists' assessment and treatment practices for people with progressive dysarthria. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(6), 725–737.
Colman, M., & Healy, P. (2011). The distribution of repair in dialogue. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 33, 1563–1568.
Comrie, P., MacKenzie, C., & McCall, J. (2001). The influence of acquired dysarthria on conversational turn-taking. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 15(5), 383–398.
De Keyser, K., Santens, P., Bockstael, A., Botteldooren, D., Talsma, D., De Vos, S., Van Cauwenberghe, M., Verheugen, F., Corthals, P., & De Letter, M. (2016). The relationship between speech production and speech perception deficits in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(5), 915–931.
Dideriksen, C., Christensen, M. H., Tylén, K., Dingemanse, M., & Fusaroli, R. (2023). Quantifying the interplay of conversational devices in building mutual understanding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(3), 864–889.
Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., Gisladottir, R. S., Kendrick, K. H., Levinson, S. C., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Enfield, N. J. (2015). Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLOS ONE, 10(9), Article e0136100.
Dorsey, E., Sherer, T., Okun, M. S., & Bloem, B. R. (2018). The emerging evidence of the Parkinson pandemic. Journal of Parkinson's Disease, 8(s1), S3–S8.
Kendrick, K. H. (2015). The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 250.
Kitzinger, C. (2012). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). Wiley.
Kuzentsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Lenth, R. V. (2024). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (Version 1.9.0) [R package]. CRAN. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
Levelt, W. J. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41–104.
Liss, J. M., Spitzer, S., Caviness, J. N., Adler, C., & Edwards, B. (1998). Syllabic strength and lexical boundary decisions in the perception of hypokinetic dysarthric speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(4), 2457–2466.
McAuliffe, M. J., Baylor, C. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (2017). Variables associated with communicative participation in Parkinson's disease and its relationship to measures of health-related quality-of-life. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(4), 407–417.
McCabe, R. (2007). Conversation analysis. In M. Slade & S. Priebe (Eds.), Choosing methods in mental health research: Mental health research from theory to practice (pp. 40–62). Routledge.
McKinlay, A., Dalrymple-Alford, J., Grace, R., & Roger, D. (2009). The effect of attentional set-shifting, working memory, and processing speed on pragmatic language functioning in Parkinson's disease. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(2–3), 330–346.
Mertens, J. B., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2021). Cognitive and social delays in the initiation of conversational repair. Dialogue & Discourse, 12(1), 21–44.
Miller, N., Deane, K. H., Jones, D., Noble, E., & Gibb, C. (2011). National survey of speech and language therapy provision for people with Parkinson's disease in the United Kingdom: Therapists' practices. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46(2), 189–201.
Miller, N., Noble, E., Jones, D., & Burn, D. (2006). Life with communication changes in Parkinson's disease. Age and Ageing, 35(3), 235–239.
Moya-Galé, G., & Levy, E. S. (2019). Parkinson's disease-associated dysarthria: Prevalence, impact and management strategies. Research and Reviews in Parkinsonism, 9, 9–16.
Planalp, S., & Benson, A. (1992). Friends' and acquaintances' conversations I: Perceived differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(4), 483–506.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Sapir, S. (2014). Multiple factors are involved in the dysarthria associated with Parkinson's disease: A review with implications for clinical practice and research. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(4), 1330–1343.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W., & Jones, R. H. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reader, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). The relationship closeness induction task. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1–4.
Sixt Börjesson, M., Hartelius, L., & Laakso, K. (2021). Communicative participation in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 73(2), 101–108.
Speer, S. P., Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, L., Tsoi, L., Burns, S. M., Falk, E. B., & Tamir, D. I. (2024). Hyperscanning shows friends explore and strangers converge in conversation. Nature Communications, 15(1), Article 7781.
Spencer, K., Friedlander, C., & Brown, K. (2020). Predictors of health-related quality of life and communicative participation in individuals with dysarthria from Parkinson's disease. International Journal of Neurodegenerative Disorders, 3(1), 14.
Templeton, E. M., Chang, L. J., Reynolds, E. A., Cone LeBeaumont, M. D., & Wheatley, T. (2023). Long gaps between turns are awkward for strangers but not for friends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1875), Article 20210471.
Torrence, J. M., Baylor, C. R., Yorkston, K. M., & Spencer, K. A. (2016). Addressing communicative participation in treatment planning for adults: A survey of U.S. speech-language pathologists. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(3), 355–370.
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2010). The Wildcat Corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language and Speech, 53(4), 510–540.
Weintraub, S., Dikmen, S. S., Heaton, R. K., Tulsky, D. S., Zelazo, P. D., Bauer, P. J., Carlozzi, N. E., Slotkin, J., Blitz, D., Wallner-Allen, K., Fox, N. A., Beaumont, J. L., Mungas, D., Nowinski, C. J., Richler, J., Deocampo, J. A., Anderson, J. E., Manly, J. J., Borosh, B., … Gershon, R. C. (2013). Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology, 80(11, Suppl. 3), S54–S64.
Yang, W., Hamilton, J. L., Kopil, C., Beck, J. C., Tanner, C. M., Albin, R. L., Ray Dorsey, E., Dahodwala, N., Cintina, I., & Hogan, P. (2020). Current and projected future economic burden of Parkinson's disease in the U.S. NPJ Parkinson's Disease, 6(1), Article 15.
Yorkston, K. M., Baylor, C. R., Klasner, E. R., Deitz, J., Dudgeon, B. J., Eadie, T., Miller, R. M., & Amtmann, D. (2007). Satisfaction with communicative participation as defined by adults with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40(6), 433–451.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Newly Published
Pages: 1-17
PubMed: 40466626

History

  • Received: Nov 14, 2024
  • Revised: Mar 1, 2025
  • Accepted: Mar 19, 2025
  • Published online: Jun 4, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan
Department of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe
Department of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing financial or nonfinancial interests existed at the time of publication.
Correspondence to: Katerina A. Tetzloff: [email protected]
Editor-in-Chief: Jessica E. Huber
Editor: Michelle S. Troche

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share